Originally Posted by KimboSlice
Hi Shiressleuth! Honestly Ive only seen discussion on DV in social work notes during inpatient hospital stays or if the mother is actively seeking help and trying to remove herself from the situation.
Im thinking that LE would have excluded DN by now if there was documentation of him being at the OB appointment thus giving him an alibi.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've seen in records where a spouse or parent is incarcerated or not but nothing in detail of any convictions or previous charges. Now on KN's ultrasound appointment it is fairly common for a nurse or Doc to enter into the clinical or SOAP notes that the patient is accompanied by spouse husband, mother, father etc. Or even patient came to clinic unaccompanied for today's appointment. So I agree with KimboSlice if there was a thread of evidence showing DN was with KN at that appointment he would have been off of the radar by now.
Short and 2 the point is good.I cant post long posts using an iPad so if I seem short and to the point please remember that.
What I want to say really is that this was an opportunist who had some idea of what he wanted to do that day or any given day, IMO. He knew nobody was coming and trapped the girls at the end of the bridge. I still think they escaped across the water once they were together off the bridge. He caught them because he didnt want a witness.
That took some copy pasta
LE never said they are trying to prove DN is responsible. Some members here are.
Seems like he's going for a plea deal the same as RL did. Why not just post bail and fight the charges if your innocent?Maybe DN is just doing what his attorney is telling him to do. Just like RL did and got raked over the coals for doing so.
Cuz you go down the hill first then across the creek....How would you explain the down the hill comment if they had both got across the lake together?
What about the Subpoena dulces tecum then? Can you explain that?Good point. No doubt LE has already given DN a thorough scrubbing, just like the other hundred (or more) POIs. Nothing they’ve said in recent months suggests they’re zeroing-in on DN. Just the opposite, in fact. <modsnip>
You do know he’s not been charged with murder, right? He’s been charged with a number of comparatively minor complaints, all of which he’s probably guilty. Plea deals benefit both the accused (some charges are dropped) and the state (avoiding the time and expense of a trial).Seems like he's going for a plea deal the same as RL did. Why not just post bail and fight the charges if your innocent?
Seems like he's going for a plea deal the same as RL did. Why not just post bail and fight the charges if your innocent?
I’m on my phone and haven’t figured out on this how to find the thank you button so you get an applause! LE has not taken him off of the POI status. Thank you!
From the Dr. Phil show:
Dr. Phil talking about growing up in a small town....
-Dr. Phil: "If somebody showed up that didn't belong you stuck out like a sore thumb...and if some transient showed up they just stuck out like a sore thumb."
-ISP Superintendent Carter We believe that the sketch that you see behind you was a face to face encounter with a citizen of Delphi."
-Dr. Phil: "When you look at the area around there what's the most likely way for this person to have gotten away, would he have gotten away by car by foot, what's the most likely way for him to have gotten away?"
-ISP Superintendent Carter ...'I certainly hope in my lifetime I can look him in the eyes and ask him that same question."
Carter doesn't appear to have a specific or a likely POI he's referring to.
You do know hes not been charged with murder, right? Hes been charged with a number of comparatively minor complaints, all of which hes probably guilty. Plea deals benefit both the accused (some charges are dropped) and the state (avoiding the time and expense of a trial).
He's not guilty of anything ATM. We can have an opinion on it though.Maybe he's not innocent of waving his hatchet at people, driving without a licence, etc. but his lawyer thinks he can get him lesser charges. That does not mean he is guilty of murdering 3 people.
RSBM
Re . the transient - there were reports of a transient pan handling on the trails.
Re .the sketch - KN thinks it looks like DN.
Re. the mode of transport - LE hope to ask him when they meet him. DN's public defender turned ISP away according to DN's innocent letter so they haven't even met him yet.
If they haven't even interviewed DN yet, I can see why they can't include or exclude him yet.