If they did, they showed no interest in DN. His whereabouts were known for three months after the murders. He didnt flee. When they did check up on him months later, they showed no sign of urgency whatsoever. None. It was all routine. No evidence suggests that they were tracking him down as a potential murder suspect. I infer from DNs conduct in the months after the murders that he was not trying to elude LE. I infer from LEs lack of interest in DN until the tip after the CO arrest that they had no interest in him.
@sum zero. In the first post above you say LE didnt check DN out before the Co arrest. In the second one you say LE are doing their job following up on RSO's who don't check in. Both cannot be right. In the third post you say they weren't interested in DN until after the Co arrest. I don't understand how you can possibly know that. They couldnt interview him or issue a warrant because they didn't know where he was.
I appreciate the LE approach: not forming premature conclusions. Theyve interviewed 500 people, according to one news article. Not one has been cleared. And theyre still signaling by their recent statements, generating more publicity for this case, asking for more tips, etc., that they think the killer is still at large. Even the prosecutor, when he announced his early retirement, all but said the case was not close to being solved. He was still hoping LE would receive a tip that would generate a real lead. I understand wanting justice for the victims. But fixating on one person (when LE certainly is not) seems unwise.
Let me clarify. LE showed no interest in DN as a possible murder suspect until after they received a tip after DN’s arrest in CO. In the first three months after the murders, they knew where to find DN. Not once did they interview him about the murders. So, I stand by what I said. LE showed no interest in DN as a possible murder suspect. Later, they showed interest in him, in the course of doing routine follow-up, because he hadn’t been checking in. Still, they showed no sense of urgency in tracking him down. No APB on him, on KN, on the car they were associated with. So, I think it’s reasonable to assume they were only looking for him as a matter of routine, not because they were zeroing-in on him as a possible murder suspect.
My explanation is it was done from several sources including possibly Parabon /the BG video/witnesses/mugshot (maybe picked out by the witneses)
It fascinates me, in a sad way, how some people will not change their minds, even when presented with sound arguments and hard facts. Take the Amanda Blackburn murder. Some people still insist the husband, a pastor, was involved. Doesnt matter that three people were arrested for the murder, one of whom has agreed to testify against the others, and none of whom had any association with the husband or implicated him in any way. Doesnt matter that the murderers committed the offense during the commission of a burglary, minutes after they were caught on video inside a neighbors home they were also burgling. Doesnt matter that LE has cleared the husband of any involvement. Doesnt matter that the husband is 100% a victim. Still, some people on WS, evidence be damned, insist the husband was involved.
