Hello Harmony,
I know this has been asked before but I dont think I understood the answer.
Is there some reason why a different thread gets created ? Does the system this forum runs on have trouble after too many posts or something? We have seen it work past 100 posts on some threads so just wondering why after only 50-60 on the last thread that we had to build another one?
Just wondering if there is some reason for this.
I know having one each day for the trial made it kind of nice to keep track of the trial days.
Thanks - again! I haven't heard them mentioned either... It's really frustrating - I guess I got spoiled by FL's sunshine laws in that we had everything to pick through.
I don't understand why all of the texts are from Travis' phone only (guess JA 'lost' hers - but it was found in 2010), his computer only (the contents of hers being 'sealed' - what's up with that?)
It makes it a lot harder to piece things together... Glad you found that.
I completely agree about making up the person as a "source" of info when the real source was HER hacking into his account or doing some other spying. I don't doubt that she confronted him about something she found out from hacking/snooping/following and that would be the ONLY way she knew.... He was totally on to her and, similar to CA, she made up imaginary people to fit into her story.
I also don't doubt that the reason he said 15min was b/c if he let her take her sweet time she'd create some fake email/profile...etc to create this fictitious character.
I personally prefer psychopath but most people think its two separate species. Psychopath's Mama was actually known as Sociopath. Its roots go back to a French researcher in 1801 and was called moral insanity for the better part of a century with few variations. It was first called sociopathy in 1909 which would be used by the APA for the DSM in 1952. The next edition dropped the term.
Every researcher has their pet theory as to differences, if any, though. I think the broadened classification is a really good idea - it blends all the knowns of psychopathic and antisocial behaviors without the exclusion of psychopathic features in the DSM-IV which has only led to many assuming psychopathy isn't valid; ASPD is a required diagnosis for psychopathy; or, even worse, that ASPD is the very same thing.
Having been in a relationship with a bona fide comorbid ASPD/NPD (and likely psychopathic according to my armchair analysis) the only thing that scares me is these creatures walking the earth free of accountability. To me that particular chemistry is a bomb just waiting to explode.
------------
Schuby,
I'm unable to quote you - thread's closed. Sociopathic and psychopathic are basically (very close) cousins to antisocial personality disorder. A therapeutic psychologist would likely make that diagnosis - or a comorbidity of that and other personality disorders - rather than even a muttering of sociopathy or psychopathy.
There is a huge debate, even within the psych circle itself, if there even is a difference between a sociopath and a psychopath. For me personally, there isn't, and I simply prefer psychopath because of the negative image it conjures for many. People need to think Ted Bundy and John Wayne Gacy if doing so keeps them from becoming a victim to a cruel, cold-blooded predator very capable of destroying a person and totally ruining their life - if not actually physically taking it. IYKWIM
Various reasons...We create new threads because some members complain that very long threads make pages load slower. On court days we may allow a thread to get longer to allow testimony to be completed and when posts are rapidly being posted. HTH
I think the jury will be or maybe already are! Angered and disgusted! At her pedophilia accusation against a dead man that can't defend himself.
She has no proof of pedophilia nor DV only her word. No medical proof! No dr when she claims she hurt her finger and head when he body slammed her, she's a skinny woman! If he had done that on tile! She would be in unbearable back pain in a few days. I slipped and fell once on wet tile floor! Three days later the pain was unbearable! I couldn't even move.
She talks before thinking.
I think the lighting is playing tricks. But some great sleuther posted the pic enlarging the feet area, and both feet are flat on the floor. I was confused at first, too.I hope someone will post that photo and point out how the legs are not crossed I have looked and looked ad they still look crossed to me...I couldn't see her leg in that one photo until someone kindly pointed it out....
She has a light blue blouse on - it's the last day nurmi has her on the stand, so her 8th or 9th day up?
Listening to her testimony on HLN. Every time she says, "He just kept coming at me", I think she is reliving the stabbing, and Travis trying to defend himself.
My THEORY: She asked the detectives where the gun was, thinking they had found it, but just not returned it to her yet, or had it in evidence.I wonder how her parents feel now! Now now what she is capable of. Her mom was the one I read that asked detectives if they found the gun she bought. Does anybody know why?
I suspect Jodi just totally lied to Travis that she knew some other person that told her some dirt on him.
IMO, I think Jodi accused Travis of the false pedophile accusations and was threatening to tell other people. I think she has done this before and used this lie as a weapon to get guys to do what she wanted. She knows the accusations are false but she also knows a lot of damage can be done even with false accusations.
I don't think sealed evidence can ever be admitted in court. Nurmi asked for it to be sealed, and it was. I don't even remember Juan fighting it. It's recorded in the minutes, but I can't remember which day to point you to - sorry.I'm originally from FL, so I know what you're talking about. It is very frustrating when different states lock down docs like that.
I had asked a few threads ago (not sure if I got an answer...I tried to keep checking, but missed a few pages I'm sure).
WHY do we have these text messages (both sides)...yet we don't have Travis' FB message to her as evidence? I know they have it, but I believe someone said it couldn't be introduced b/c it would be considered hearsay. Any lawyer in the house that can clarify why some things from him are admitted, but others not?
Also, anyone know WHY (oh WHY!) the findings on her computer are sealed? Does that mean it's not in evidence or just that we can't see it?
I can't stand that all the facts are not before the jury!ullhair:
Is there a timeline of events spelled out anywhere? Or at least a reasonable/theorized timeline laid out?
I'm not calling people 'psycho' - I'm using a well known term, psychopath, to describe a certain type of personality disordered individual.Not all sociopaths are harmful to other people. Stigmatizing every person with that diagnosis or calling them "psycho" is counterproductive.
That has happened to us before. I think the cc company is leary of donations placed on line, and just wants to make sure you are authorizing it.Hoping that someone else who has also donated can answer a quick question about donations: The strangest thing just happened. In all the years I've used Paypal I've never had them initiate a call to me but they just did - questioning whether or not I authorized a payment to The Travis Alexander Legacy Fund. I confirmed that I had and that was that but now I'm hoping I used the right link and didn't accidentally send money where I shouldn't have. I used the link from this page to donate: https://www.facebook.com/TravisAlexa...ef=ts&filter=2 That's correct, isn't it? I'm a little confused because I just checked and the email associated on the receipt isn't "Justice4travisalexander" but "raisingyoufoundation@gmail.com.
I completely agree about making up the person as a "source" of info when the real source was HER hacking into his account or doing some other spying. I don't doubt that she confronted him about something she found out from hacking/snooping/following and that would be the ONLY way she knew.... He was totally on to her and, similar to CA, she made up imaginary people to fit into her story.
I also don't doubt that the reason he said 15min was b/c if he let her take her sweet time she'd create some fake email/profile...etc to create this fictitious character.
I don't think sealed evidence can ever be admitted in court. Nurmi asked for it to be sealed, and it was. I don't even remember Juan fighting it. It's recorded in the minutes, but I can't remember which day to point you to - sorry.