AZ said that he can if Nurmi brings up something new (I put it in timeline thread)
JM must connect all the dots and loose ends in a closing statement.
I actually fault JM for NOT bringing graphics charts timelines into the court.
Maybe the judge might not allow them????? But JM argument would be so much more coherent and understandable with charts, lists, timelines. He at least had the overhead layout of TA bathroom and bedroom and had JA point to locations. But JM did not MAKE much of her bathroom/bedroom testimony.
For example:
*JA was body slammed and was NOT out of breath
* Before body slam TA came out of shower wet and Picked her up
* Her head was pointed south; TA was to her right and JA rolled to her left. ( NOTE- Try to recreate or simulate this)
* TA was standing OVER her as she rolled YET JA could regain composure and breath, arise, and decamp ALL WITHOUT TA catching her. (NOTE Try to recreate or simulate this)
* The JA sprint to closet; closet door slammed; JA leap for gun; TA opening the door in pursuit; JA obtains gun assume two hand grip on a loaded gun and swings around at the TA _ who by this time must have been delayed by aliens or angels located in the closet.
* the linebacker tackle
* the arched cocked head of the linebacker prior to tackle
* the forensics of TA head wound
I will HOPE that JM will not do the CLOSING ARGUMENT extemporaneously and just wing it.
He needs to outline in detail WITH A PRINTED LIST all JA lies. He needs to ILLUSTRATE to the jury why her account of bathroom /bedroom struggle is ABSURD. JM needs GRAPHIC support for his closing argument ala Jose Baez when he did the closing of CA trial.