elitenls
Former Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2008
- Messages
- 145
- Reaction score
- 0
... And lets just put this out here.....they would not be able to re-arrest her if it was not for the fact that SHE DID THESE CRIMES.
Correct, and unlike a murder charge, there actually is fact that she committed the financial crimes.
This attorney has lied before, about a plea deal....he said it was never discussed, but then later we find out it has been discussed. As for him wanting to see the evidence against his client, they don't have to turn that over to him UNTIL she has been charged. That is the law, and so far, she has not been charged with murder so therefore, the evidence and testing they are getting now to build there case does not have to be turned over yet! He knows very well that he can file a motion of discovery ONCE his client is charged with murder- until then he has no right to any of the on going testing that is being done. He can file a motion to ask the court to allow there own independent testing, or to have an observer to over see the testing.
All true and very well put. I think his argument is that they are leaking it to the public but not backing it up with evidence; thus making everyone who reads a paper hate his client, which is causing all sorts of issues that shouldn't be happening with this case.
As for our men and woman fighting in Iraqi- I take great personal offense in him even mentioning ANYTHING to do with our service men and woman- they have NOTHING to do with what his client is being charged with. My son is in the service, he is in the service to protect our country- NOT to protect criminals that are being charged with crimes in the united states. Unless it is terrorism or an attack against our country-which is not the situation in this case, there was NO reason to mention ANY OF THIS.
I'm sorry you're offended by that. I thank your son and his sacrifice every night before I go to sleep, as do millions of others -- but that is what he's there to do. Our country IS the constitution and the bill of rights, and believe it or not, by going to "free" Iraq, they are basically creating a democracy based on our constitution -- thus the correlation.
As an after thought, yes there is a missing child, that's what this case is all about- but apparently he has joined the ranks with the Anthony's - what child?
Correction, his case is not about Caylee. His focus shouldn't be on Caylee; and Caylee should be an afterthought at this point in time for him.
As for the reporters being duped by LE. That's a joke in itself- As long as it's breaking news or any new information about this case- they will report it- even if it's negative info regarding LE
He didn't say they were "duping" them, just feeding the media engine that's driving the case -- which is EXACTLY what LE is doing.
As for the protesters being charged with stalking- well, I guess he does not know Florida law, because to be charged with stalking, you must show the court a pattern of an individual FOLLOWING you....to work, to your home,to places where you might hang out.....you can't be charged with stalking just because you stand in front of someones home with a sign.
I'm not versed well enough in FL law to comment on this, but your information seems plausible.
I think some of those protesters should be arrested for there actions- just as I think Cindy, George and Lee should be arrested for some of there actions towards the protesters. Going out at almost midnight with a hammer to pound some signs is nothing more than Cindy wanting more attention for herself. As the attorney said, when it gets quiet LE has to do something for attention- and Cindy has to do it also
I agree. I still have yet to understand what makes these people think that it's going to help -- it's not doing anything but 'causing a scene to the neighbors; the A's obviously could care less.