And seemingly no endo, either.
It said no adhesions, but I didn't think you had to have adhesions to have endometriosis?
And seemingly no endo, either.
That's the only thing I can come up with too (the clothing).
"The boy was last seen wearing black sweats with a grey shirt that had a bear on it, white socks, and light blue Pull-up."
Search continues for missing Wichita boy
The autopsy report says, "T-shirt and pants." No mention of a bear on the t-shirt, and pants and sweats could mean the same thing to some people, I suppose. No mention of socks or the pull-up.
I know it was said that there were branches and debris, but maybe DM saw enough of LH's pants and shirt to be able to say they didn't match EG's description? It would be understandable that he wouldn't have seen a pull-up since LH had pants on, but maybe he was able to see that LH didn't have socks on?
And yes, it would be nice if Nancy would elaborate on the "2nd autopsy," "the bathroom," and "the 10th or 11th!"
We could take that a couple of ways. Either it makes no sense at all and DM was misquoted, or, Lucas wasn't already deceased when she placed his body there? I hope and pray she didn't leave him there alive, if he was in a coma or knocked out by a blow to the head."He denies reports that Glass already knew Lucas was dead."
Makes no sense.
When a body has been found after a long period of time, the medical examiner or coroner should estimate the date and time of death as accu rately as possible. If an estimate is made, the information should be entered as ‘‘APPROX—date’’ and/or ‘‘APPROX—time.’’ Source. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/misc/hb_me.pdf
Very strange, as autopsy reports that I have seen in the past have either a TOD listed when a person was pronounced deceased at a hospital or the ME gives an estimate. I wonder why these two are different?I didn't even see the approximate date and time of death on EG's report though? I saw that it had some information there that might help to determine how long she'd been deceased (the rigor mortis and the livor mortis) but I don't remember anything other than that?
Very strange, as autopsy reports that I have seen in the past have either a TOD listed when a person was pronounced deceased at a hospital or the ME gives an estimate. I wonder why these two are different?
I think pull ups are made of some plastic type of material, like disposable diapers. There should have been something left of it, no matter how small. I didn't underwear listed as an article of clothing, come to think of it.Would the pull-up have decomposed in this time? Could cotton socks have also decomposed?
I'm surprised there was no description of the t-shirt and pants to see if it correlates with what EG claimed Lucas was wearing.
She was pronounced at 0144 hours at the scene, per the report.
I missed that, too! Thank you, Jax49!Well noticed, I didn't see that!
But pronounced isn't the same as the time of death? I suppose it had to be between 7pm and 1.44am, and as it's declared suicide it doesn't make any difference to know the exact time.
okay ..HOLD on a minute....then Emily put Lucas under the bridge alive????? Sorry. that is NOT common sense!!!
Thanks for stating this...it is so close to how I feel. It is almost as if Emily made a deal with the devil. I really don't know if they would have pressed murder charges on her. She walked on endangerment charges even though from her own mouth,she confessed driving under the influence of mj. I tend to skip over parts about her death. She chose it and she inflicted pain upon JO and JH by not coming clean about her actions...I am most angry for Lucas. His story deserves to be told- what happened to him, who did it (we can assume Emily, but you never know....) and as close to the time that it happened. I feel like it's another slap in the face to an adorable little boy who's short life was filled with pain and abuse, at least those last couple of years. His story is now left in limbo. This isn't fair to him. He deserves to have a voice speak for him, and once again, another child's story has been squelched and those who knew more about what happened to him walk away free to live life like the child never existed.
Here is my question: Nancy Grace stated that the bathroom manner of death situation was discovered in a SECOND autopsy. Is it possible that the family paid another ME to do a second autopsy which yielded different results before having Lucas cremated? Or maybe another ME volunteered to lend their expertise? Or did Nancy Grace just get more bogus information?
I don't think he will release them because he won't want to reveal his techniques. But I'm hoping he will tell us what all she said.I too hope DM's recordings are released. 6 1/2 hours of that day he found Lucas. He also mentioned he did not record anyone on the first day he met up with JH and EG.
Yes, thank you but I don't recall reading any mention of a time of death.When a body has been found after a long period of time, the medical examiner or coroner should estimate the date and time of death as accu rately as possible. If an estimate is made, the information should be entered as ‘‘APPROX—date’’ and/or ‘‘APPROX—time.’’ Source. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/misc/hb_me.pdf
okay ..HOLD on a minute....then Emily put Lucas under the bridge alive????? Sorry. that is NOT common sense!!!
I wish they had tested his hair for drug evidence, including meth.
From my daughter's specialist,she said that the endo sticks to everything and causes adhesions... it sticks to almost everything like bladder,ovaries,etc. You can only tell if a dr goes n there,so this dr would have spotted itIt said no adhesions, but I didn't think you had to have adhesions to have endometriosis?
I'm surprised too. Plus descriptions of any stains (blood, vomit or urine etc) on the clothes, I doubt they were completely submerged under water. There is the possibility that she put him in clean clothes though before she hid him.I'm surprised there was no description of the t-shirt and pants to see if it correlates with what EG claimed Lucas was wearing.