Thanks for the giggle...."*advertiser censored*". It helped me me read through it.Transcript of EG jail interview.
(furious, I'm going to have a cocktail or 3 and dinner with my husband, but will be back to rant tomorrow)
100% accuracy is not guaranteed.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fAa1pXe_IXlv9WZ9uOizGk7X5PKrWLyr
I probably should not even write this right now, but I cannot resist. Could the mysterious smoking man be JH?
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
This makes so much sense. Lucas comes to the back door and the
adult just picks him up and takes him without shoes or jacket in order to escape being noticed.
If he had gone back to work in TX, and they didn't say she had hit them, then the visits may have gone on as usual. I, however, did find it odd that they were there on the 11th. I'd be uncertain about sending them based on the history in that home.
I probably should not even write this right now, but I cannot resist. Could the mysterious smoking man be JH?
Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
And that the alleged abuse by JH happened on 2/4/2018 and EG moved on 2/7/2018.
MOO
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Alleged abuse by JH on 2/4, EH moves on 2/7.I think it might be her ex. As I have thought, this case isnt so black and white. Moo
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There is a news report that references court docs that EG only had supervised visits with her older boys until October 2017. The judge seemed Leary about allowing it, but the fact that she was the sole care taker of Lucas was used as proof of her being able to care for her own children. Dad didn't seem to want to send them, but was following court orders, imo.
I've wondered that myself a couple threads ago.
I'm wondering if she moved out of the home with no intention of remaining a couple? I wonder if JH is in the lease? Lots of questions.
Why would we believe anything she says....Ok, this new abuse report is throwing a monkey wrench into the works....:thinking: .....
So it is now reported that she told her ex that she threw JH out, and 3 days later she moves to the new address.
Did she really throw him out? How does she rent this nice new house, if she kicked him out? Is he still paying all of her monthly bills/expenses, even though he is not living there anymore?
He would be on the hook for child support. But they are not married so he would not have to pay her entire monthly expenses.
And why wasn't this report made/filed until now if it happened on Feb 4th?
And WHY did she send that snap of the random strangers to JH, if she had supposedly kicked him out?
So I guess we can assume that she didn't really kick him out. Maybe he left for a day or so?
Ok, this new abuse report is throwing a monkey wrench into the works....:thinking: .....
So it is now reported that she told her ex that she threw JH out, and 3 days later she moves to the new address.
Did she really throw him out? How does she rent this nice new house, if she kicked him out? Is he still paying all of her monthly bills/expenses, even though he is not living there anymore?
He would be on the hook for child support. But they are not married so he would not have to pay her entire monthly expenses.
And why wasn't this report made/filed until now if it happened on Feb 4th?
And WHY did she send that snap of the random strangers to JH, if she had supposedly kicked him out?
So I guess we can assume that she didn't really kick him out. Maybe he left for a day or so?
Why would we believe anything she says....
Sent from my P00I using Tapatalk
Oh my gosh! Lol!First of all, thank you so much for transcribing.
Second of all, "fake crying like a *advertiser censored*"....Thank you for a laugh that provided a brief respite from such horrible subject matter. Kadoober's telling it like it is, people!
I can tell you, by the time you file the report, show pictures, have the child questioned, paperwork is filled out, yada yada, it can indeed take a few weeks to get the ball rolling and into the courts. He may have reported the abuse right away, from there, the child has to be interviewed, EG and JH, and other witnesses, if any, that saw what happened. It's not so easy to get these situations resolved, but I am grateful he did this- at least the baby is now in good care and out of a hostile environment.
If this was the case, though, why would she have custody of Lucas after he left for work in Texas? Why wouldn't he place Lucas with bio mom or another family member in that area where he works? I understand what you're saying, but she isn't the custodial parent, and if they broke up, JH or JO would have rights to Lucas before EG.
If you freeze the video on the docs - it appears EG told the father that JH said it was an accident and she kicked him out after that. Also the papers were not filed until Feb 28th, so EG probably was not even aware that he was gonna take legal action.
Without scrolling all the way up. Can someone answer what day she got moved out of the clinic and into a pod?
I agree that she would not have rights to him. But if she "kicked him out" after the incident on the 4th maybe he was gone working already or something. If they broke up in some fashion, JH never should have left Lucas with her. He should have missed work or something, anything, before that, but hindsight is 20/20. We know from this forum that Lucas' maternal family loved him dearly, but it doesn't seem like JH appreciated that fact.