LeAnna (Mom) #1

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
LONI COOMBS, FORMER PROSECUTOR:

The lack of her husband's name is a very telling point to me. Very different from her comments at the funeral where she was a stand by your man woman. You know, I love him. He's a wonderful husband. He's a wonderful father. I trust him. Now she's not saying anything. And I think there is something to be said for reading between the lines here. As a prosecutor, you know that there's things going on behind-the-scenes.

The prosecution is looking at two potential suspects here. It's very clear in the probable cause hearing they went out of their way to put on evidence about her when they didn't need to. It wasn't her probable cause hearing, showing that they are working towards mounting a case against her. They're still trying to decide, are we going to use her as a cooperative witness, is she going to be charged, or is there a possibility that they might turn her against him or him against her. The fact that this statement was so vague about the case, in fact, no mention of the case itself at all, lends the credibility that these discussions are going on.


I agree with this wholeheartedly. Throughout the entire PCH, all I kept thinking is ...they are definitely going after LH. This was Ross' hearing and they spent a good amount of time laying out Leanne's statements at the daycare,and later at the jail, her stunning lack of emotion, that she didn't cry at all and that her mother commented on her unemotional demeanor. Just by their questions and testimony alone created the tone of "They did this together you honor" without ever having to say it out loud.

I believe that she is not under arrest or charged yet because the prosecution is playing chess and hedging their bets who will turn on who for a plea deal. They already have RH in custody, they were also probably hoping for visits and phonecalls where they could glean even more information for their investigation. Before she left for Alabama of course. I think they will eventually charge her, or she will testify against him for some level of immunity or lesser charges with mercy. Or he will turn on her first and plea out. Dollars to doughnuts...

They are simply playing chess with both of them right now. :cow:
 
Leanna doesn't need a team of lawyers if she's innocent. If she wants to put an end to speculation, all she needs to say is, "I had nothing to do with Cooper's death. I didn't plan it. I didn't help to plan it. I didn't know Ross was planning it if in fact he did."

But she's not denying involvement, is she? To me, that's the most damning evidence against her to date.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Everyone needs a lawyer when they have legal issues or complications. Innocent people especially.
 
Right. And wasn't Lin Wood part of the Ramsey 'dream team' that intimidated the Boulder DA from prosecuting the Ramseys despite the Grand Jury indictment?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The very same. He's come after Tricia before...
 
Like it or not the girl is SMART and not one to mess with. I guess there's no way she was a mousy mentally abused wife after all. I thought perhaps she was.
Yep, she's pizzed now and somebody's gonna pay.
It takes brains to be a Dietician, have to study Food Chemistry, Organic Chemistry. My sister is one.
 
Interesting. So Lin Wood can represent plaintiffs in DaVita Medicare fraud suit, as well as one of their employees in a non-related defamation suit?
 
Other Significant lawsuits
On November 30, 2012, CNN covered the DaVita Inc. Medicare and Medicaid Fraud Lawsuit pending in which Wood is a lead attorney for the plaintiffs.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/L._Lin_Wood

Isn't DaVita LH's employer?

Yes. So does this mean DaVita is going to pay for the cost of Lin Wood's fees???:waitasec::waitasec::waitasec::thinking:
 
Her child is 4 weeks dead and her husband is sitting in jail, accused of causing it and she is looking at a defamation case. WTH I must have my priorities mixed up.

With Ramsey attorney Lin Wood, no less! She is digging herself in deeper............JMO
 
I agree with this wholeheartedly. Throughout the entire PCH, all I kept thinking is ...they are definitely going after LH. This was Ross' hearing and they spent a good amount of time laying out Leanne's statements at the daycare,and later at the jail, her stunning lack of emotion, that she didn't cry at all and that her mother commented on her unemotional demeanor. Just by their questions and testimony alone created the tone of "They did this together you honor" without ever having to say it out loud.

I believe that she is not under arrest or charged yet because the prosecution is playing chess and hedging their bets who will turn on who for a plea deal. They already have RH in custody, they were also probably hoping for visits and phonecalls where they could glean even more information for their investigation. Before she left for Alabama of course. I think they will eventually charge her, or she will testify against him for some level of immunity or lesser charges with mercy. Or he will turn on her first and plea out. Dollars to doughnuts...

They are simply playing chess with both of them right now. :cow:

Keep in mind they have to play this game of chess very carefully.

If they do charge her, she could plead the 5th, and any testimony the potentially could have culled out of her against RH goes out the window ...
 
I agree with this wholeheartedly. Throughout the entire PCH, all I kept thinking is ...they are definitely going after LH. This was Ross' hearing and they spent a good amount of time laying out Leanne's statements at the daycare,and later at the jail, her stunning lack of emotion, that she didn't cry at all and that her mother commented on her unemotional demeanor. Just by their questions and testimony alone created the tone of "They did this together you honor" without ever having to say it out loud.

I believe that she is not under arrest or charged yet because the prosecution is playing chess and hedging their bets who will turn on who for a plea deal. They already have RH in custody, they were also probably hoping for visits and phonecalls where they could glean even more information for their investigation. Before she left for Alabama of course. I think they will eventually charge her, or she will testify against him for some level of immunity or lesser charges with mercy. Dollars to doughnuts...

They are simply playing chess with both of them right now. :cow:

I think at the hearing they were laying the foundation for a grand jury indictment for her. At this point, she's going to have a very difficult time using a battered woman defense and maybe that has been their goal all along. The way she is acting publicly is as a co-conspirator, imo.
 
I disagree. Innocent people don't need to lawyer up, only the guilty do.

Sorry, You are wrong. How about Ryan Ferguson? Or Richard Jewel?

Everyone needs a lawyer when dealing with the police or legal situation.
 
It takes brains to be a Dietician, have to study Food Chemistry, Organic Chemistry. My sister is one.

Agreed. My friend's mother is one and consults for 3 major food mfgr's. she had to take tons of chemistry - (yuck! Not my bag)

I said in the general discussion thread last weel that I don't for one second think she's an idiot. Clever girl in fact.
 
It takes brains to be a Dietician, have to study Food Chemistry, Organic Chemistry. My sister is one.
I know! No offense to anyone, but it is grueling, from what I have heard...
A renal dietitian at that, other than dislysis, diet is the other biggie with kidney disease/failure.
A friend of mine just did a live donation yesterday, and her brother also received a kidney.
She isn't even allowed to have Coca cola.
I know kidney patients have to limit protien, but I don't know much else.
She also graduated with almost 4.0 I think.
Add in some righteous indignation and she may be a force to be reckoned with.
 
Yeah....not saying that she is not intelligent, but I doubt that any of us would want her near our bedsides if we were deathly ill. Sheesh. JMO
 
Keep in mind they have to play this game of chess very carefully.

If they do charge her, she could plead the 5th, and any testimony the potentially could have culled out of her against RH goes out the window ...


Likely they will straight up just charge her separately and of course, she will have her own trial. I just believe that this holding pattern has nothing to do with LE's belief that she had nothing to do with it. They are probably waiting for phone records from AT & T. They are being very careful and thorough and smart about it in my opinion and want all of their ducks in a row before they arrest her. Also sometimes people crumble under the pressure of what they have done just knowing that the police are suspicious of them. Rachael Shoaf comes to mind. (Skylar Neese's murderer).

And..she would likely never testify anyway, as it is rarity that occurs. It was Ross' PCH, pertaining to his charges, I found it very telling that part of it focused very much on her behavior. Behavior that they specifically stated was disconcerting. Not charging her and allowing her to interact with RH, via visits, phone calls, Skype, only gives them more information and more opportunity to observe them interacting and her behavior on its own .

Sadly, I do not believe that Leanne is innocent in this. That is just my gut from what evidence I have seen so far, coupled with her utter lack of emotion, and funeral antics. I believe she will be arrested and charged accordingly when the time comes. :moo:

And as far as LH being intelligent, her degree requires a lot of rigor. BUT, there is a big difference between book smart and social intelligence or street smarts. You can have one and totally lack the other.
 
LOL. That tickled me.

Seriously, though, I'm scratching my head, can any of our legal experts weigh in here? What would be the grounds for this defamation suit? I haven't seen one media outlet come right out and say she's a murderer or an accomplice, yep, plenty of inferring, suggesting, surmising based on her demeanour, actions and words in the wake of Cooper's death but no more than there is in any other controversial case. I'm stunned by this latest development.

IMO it's a HUGE warning to the media...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
161
Total visitors
283

Forum statistics

Threads
608,556
Messages
18,241,214
Members
234,401
Latest member
CRIM1959
Back
Top