SoCalSleuth
Verified Expert
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 1,729
- Reaction score
- 381
Amen
Let's not forget that Caylee's car seat and baby doll were in the car when they picked it up too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Amen
What hit me like a ton of bricks:
Will this be Casey's defense?:
Her parents never got her any help for her bad behavior and this eventually leads her to where she is now: accused of killing Caylee. Maybe she did, or didn't, but doesn't the responsibility lie with her formative years of being coddled by her parents, never knowing the consequences of her actions?
Wonder.
As everyone has mentioned this case is full of WTF's. One questionable act you can give the benefit of the doubt to someone, a continuos string of them, like in this case, it just solidifies the case.
For me early on, this case troubled me because no one had ever met the nanny. My sister-in-law had my nephew when she was 17 and everyone in the family helps out and is involved (sometimes to her annoyance). We are all so close with him, because when teenagers have children they tend to be self absorbed and only concerned with themselves. As a family you try to fill the void for the lack of maternal insticts or because a father is not around. I know that there have been times where my in-laws did not call my sister-in-law on her selfish behavior because they were afraid that she would leverage the child against them. So there is NO way someone as selfish as KC would never ask her parents, Lee, or a friend to help her out and pickup or drop off the Caylee if she was truly working. The fact that CA says that Caylee never talked of the nanny...strange. What about payment, KC had to steal money and her parent's paid for everything, but they believe she never needed to borrow money to pay the nanny. I think GA and CA had so much going on with working and providing for Caylee in ever other way, that they simply did not want to deal with the fact that KC was lying to them about working.
And LE may just have that at this point too. I believe there was something in that bag the woman took from their house. She called LE and we never heard from her again.
Let's not forget that Caylee's car seat and baby doll were in the car when they picked it up too.
Did anyone see on a recent interview that Cindy said
"Casey is as much of a victim as Caylee"
I can't believe she would say that
I guess I shouldn't be surprised
Originally Posted by Friday:
My first, "Huh, what's this?" was early on, when LA announced that they'd thrown away all the stuffed toys/animals that people had been sending them because some of them smelled like cigarette smoke and the A's weren't smokers.
Until then, I rather liked and respected him, but that needless statement of his made me go "Huh? What?!"
I couldn't imagine why he would want to publicly insult all the well-meaning donors, smokers and non-smokers, by showing contempt for their gifts. That indicated to me that he had a streak of arrogant superiority along with a cold indifference to the feelings of others. (Remind you of anyone else in the family?")
Anyway, I tried to ignore that feeling about him because he seemed to be honest and cooperative with LE. As we've learned more about him, I'm back to my original conclusion and worse.
Oh and btw, I'm Friday and I've been lurking and learning here for many weeks.
I've listened to this again and again and my understanding of this interchange is that Lee is trying to keep Cindy from going postal in the other room and he thinks Casey isn't saying where Caylee is just to make her mom a little more nuts for having ruined her night with Tony. I got that he was trying to get Casey to quit tweaking at her mom and just tell her where she is and to not force her mom to get the police involved. I don't believe he was suggesting a coverup.....at this point. Just a "end this BS now, Casey, it isn't funny." His next statements about how Casey told him that "I haven't seen my daughter in 31 days." changed everything.
31 days. That sums it up.
That was SO STRANGE. It almost sounded to me like HE had something to hide from the police at the time.
I'm wondering if she is pregnant. Can you imagine?!
Ohh you could be right ..ITA she has put on weightI'm wondering if she is pregnant. Can you imagine?!
Mine REALLY BIG huh moment came after the obvious initial ones; 31 days, etc.
When I read one of the interviews - I think it was the high school friend (Kaomarie or something like that) of KC said that she tried to give the baby to her for adoption to this friend but CA said NO.
KC didn't want this baby from the VERY BEGINNING...
Ohh you could be right ..ITA she has put on weight
It would also seem that in KC's dozens of photos, there would be at least ONE photo of the nanny with Caylee.
Why would she count the days, unless she had did something, what she did obviously happened 31 days from the date her mother called, which was July 15, 2008 and that would make 31 days going back June 16, 2008, we all know what happen that day!:furious:
This is the other thing that bothered me so if she specifically said 31 days
why did she tell the cops the last time she saw Caylee was June 9th ??