maybe just a rabbit hole here but in the previous citation with which I was corrected, BH states:
Interesting, but how does that square with him hanging out at the Hillside and the Waterfall with a bunch of cops?
i can't give you a quote. I believe it was maybe said in testimony or an interview watched...I can't give a source so may be my imagination....but honestly it makes sense. If she were my daughter and she told me the situation and that she and her bf not getting along I would advise to think about leaving for the sake of the children.
the 2.27am google search came in on defense cross of Jen Mc. Prosecution elicited a denial/the digital tech must be wrong on redirect but did not challenge the validity in a technical way at that time. Hopefully I'm recalling correctly. Am relatively new to this case too but from what I can gather both sides will be calling experts for search history but hasn't happenned yet and the P' is only now starting to bring in witnesses for digital/forensic So all you allude to in your questions is still to come imo. WElcome btw! moo
I saw Sandwich!
Thank you...so many texts etc. but that is exactly where I got that idea..parents knew about the issues. It is not the the situation where father has custody of kids....it is now the uncle with custody and then you bring in gf who seems to be at home more and parenting. Anyone can figure this relationship may go bad.
I saw the explanation of leaving a window open and looking at other things which then pick up the time the window is opened. I think this is B.S. and will be refuted. If I look at my history each search has its very own time and I often don't close windows. A real battle of experts for sure. I think this search could be really really bad for state and Jen.
I wonder how credible jury will find BH. I suppose it will come down to whether they believe him or not if nothing solid comes up to dispute his dodgy explanation for sim card destruction?. Is he coming back at all, can D call him once they get underway?
I did read that too but don't remember where. I did think that yes, the kids come with John. It can be a deal breaker to a relationship and one should be honest with themselves and the person who has kids, adopted, or their own. You are in the kids world and their world is centered on the adults they live with and have their main and incredibly important relationship with that stays with them forever. How it effects their feelings of safety, wellbeing, love and self esteem. I did think reading that she needed to dissolve the relationship earlier on.
Right. if the reverse was happenning... wtaf. Think d is bringing in some expert to solidify it, so when exactly is cw going to contest it in any scientific way? Are they only planning to cross the d's witness and not bring in their own? Wouldn't the right time have been after JM, because surely they new the 2.27 search would come during her cross right? It's almost like some kind of hubric arrogance as in 'we don't need to contest this right now, just take our word for it and consider KR and her team fabricators and liers'. jmo
yes I remember that..could have come from Jen or Kerri that night...I guess CW will use this as the motive and while I believe there were major issues I don't think she set out that night "to do him in". It would help CW to have a motive so we will hear more about it.
They were also very young that came to him and under such heartbreaking circumstances to their beings. Shock and loss and confusion. Not just a simple slide in of two children with the rest of their childhood onward in front of them. John was said to be very excited his niece was accepted at the Catholic High School, that is an example of how he was parenting regarding schooling. A person that close to the family has to be on board and supportive of all of them. TRICKY, unless solid and a happy and honest relationship forging ahead together. Yes, it takes a village for sure and it was said how other parents pitched in for rides/ childcare, as we do/did with our own, back and forth. It's just that JO needed to be very upfront in how he was parenting on every level and who he trusted on every level with the two kids. I'm sure he was and KR thought it would be fine and still be with JO but she said herself, did not want kids, so not an instant family, happy and wanted by her it seems. Her parents knew this and see how things are from their perspective of life and that relationship/kids.
Karen Read’s parents say she and O’Keefe became serious in 2019 right before the Covid pandemic.
