Charlot123
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 9,252
- Reaction score
- 62,402
You still think she hit him with her car, despite it being painfully clear that Proctor was set on getting her convicted no matter what the truth was. I’m shawked and hawrified.
Realistically, I am incredibly detached from this case. My heart is with JO’s family. In all this noise, we didn’t hear much about JO and what person he was. I hope his family will be able to preserve his legacy and tell us more about him.
I have been busy and unaware of what happened today. Did Proctor state on record that he was “dead set on getting her convicted no matter what the truth was?” Or was it Jackson who stated it? Or someone else?
MOO: KR’s lawyers are very good lawyers. Which means that for a reimbursement commensurate with their talent and reputation, they are dead set on getting her acquitted. And likely, will. I prefer Iris Eytan, she did it more elegantly, without involvement of unsavory personalities, but the result is all. The truth? Isn’t it from the area of attorney-client privilege?
It is my understanding that the cameras didn’t work, so no one is captured on camera hitting JO, killing JO or planting the evidence. We are left with weighing in the probability what is easier to conceal, something that one person participated in or something that 20+ people witnessed and tried to suppress.
JMO: Proctor’s case gives ample proof that a conspiracy of 20+ people is less likely. Proctor didn’t yet start investigating, but erupted in texts giving friends and colleagues a piece of his mind. How many blabbermouths and gossipers should be there, statistically, in a group of 20+ people?