It appears though that this is a moral / ethical problem and not a legal one you are having with this case.
For one, FF has not said a word about this / CB the same. This means that it was all done legally by the book and there is nothing to condemn here apart from raising some ethical issues.
My issue is a legal/constitutional one.
For example, the principles of natural justice. In general I don't believe the state should be allowed to convict you in the court of public opinion, without you having notice of the case and the opportunity to answer it.
Many posters seem happy with it in the present case, because CB is an evil person. But what if something like this was done against someone who was actually innocent?
Especially I feel HCWs statement highlighted by
@Anxala is unconstitutional, smearing a citizen with secret evidence.
You'd think CB guilty if you knew what HCW knew, yet somehow such evidence also does not prove guilt.
That is an obvious breach of natural justice in my opinion - but having received judicial permission to go public for the appeal, there appears to be little judicial oversight over what HCW has gone on to say in numerous interviews.
So we end up having to hope the prosecutors are just taking their time.