Auntie_Seagull
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2020
- Messages
- 143
- Reaction score
- 1,508
Nora had unusually many ulcer perforations* [3:47] in her intestine and in her peritoneum [earlier in the film].
Peritoneum? Not in the duodenum?
Nora had unusually many ulcer perforations* [3:47] in her intestine and in her peritoneum [earlier in the film].
In short, sounds like inconclusive still? No signs of attack (but dna may have washed away). Injuries consistent with the jungle. Ulcers suggest severe stress level, poor girl.Nora Anne Quoirin inquest: Pathologists affirm no visible signs of sexual, physical assault, estimated time of death at least three days before body’s discovery | Malay Mail
This is quite lengthy
He also agreed when it was suggested that determining the circumstances that led to Quoirin’s death was far more complicated, adding that he and Dr Siew took into consideration every possibility to rule out any foul play but failed to obtain a definite lead.
He also asserted that there were no signs of struggle or defensive marks present on Quoirin’s wrists or forearms, and her naturally compliant behaviour may also have contributed to the lack of markings.
As for the multiple abrasion wounds seen all over Quoirin’s body and limbs, Dr Hanif hypothesised that they were consistent with her disappearance in the dense jungle.
“Through my site visit, I found that the injuries sustained by the deceased were consistent with the circumstances of the surrounding area where she was found,” he said, adding that he could not find any extraordinary injuries except the ones mentioned earlier.
When asked if it is possible for biological evidence such as seminal fluid to have been washed away since Quoirin was found submerged in a stream, Dr Hanif said it was possible.
I believe it's as conclusive as it can be.In short, sounds like inconclusive still? No signs of attack (but dna may have washed away). Injuries consistent with the jungle. Ulcers suggest severe stress level, poor girl.
Yes I agree I'm sure they did a great job.I believe it's as conclusive as it can be.
They did a great job.
The lack of even Nora's footsteps anywhere close to where her body was located is a mystery, unless... either herself or whoever brought her there travelled by water?
Is that a possibility @Chiatos ? Would a small boat have had access or not? You know terrain best.
Nothing to suggest an abduction or transfer to the area by a third party (which was my strongest theory up until now).
I thought it was said earlier that Nora was 5 foot 1. That's not unusual for an adult - I'm 5' 1''."Nora was much obviously much shorter than an average adult. So waist-height for an adult would be getting on to chest height for Nora ..."
Both were perforated..... many perforations.Peritoneum? Not in the duodenum?
Both parents discussed this in their testimonies.The family has traveled places in previous years, think it mentioned going to see relatives - but have they been doing this type of travel, staying at a similar place - not a hotel or at a relative’s home? There’s a big difference between this resort and staying at a chain hotel.
The other piece of the puzzle we will never know - the siblings testimony. There is information about Nora that would be important about the trip, that evening, sleeping arrangements plus interaction on a daily basis with Nora. Much different perspective than the parents.
JMO
I don't know the terrain, but based on pictures of the surroundings and based on the aerial view or the area, I certainly don't expect a boat in that stream.I believe it's as conclusive as it can be.
They did a great job.
The lack of even Nora's footsteps anywhere close to where her body was located is a mystery, unless... either herself or whoever brought her there travelled by water?
Is that a possibility @Chiatos ? Would a small boat have had access or not? You know terrain best.
But no marks at all found?I don't know the terrain, but based on pictures of the surroundings and based on the aerial view or the area, I certainly don't expect a boat in that stream.
I know!But no marks at all found?
No footprints at all?
Nothing.
I remember that part. I was just wondering if this type of environment was new/scary/standard stuff to Nora?Both parents discussed this in their testimonies.
They asked a friend to recommend a place close to KualaLumpar, they only intended staying there a few days. It was merely a stop-over venue.
I cant imagine Nora making her way that far on her own either Lilibet. It's just as bizarre as it always was.How Nora got to her final resting place will probably remain a mystery. Regarding lack of evidence of abduction or transfer to the area by a third party (interesting wording), absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence (of a third party). I’m still struggling with Nora getting there on her own. Could the parents’ estimate of her abilities be so unrealistic as to insist adamantly that she couldn’t do it? There is no one in Malaysia who can definitively assert that she could have gone on her own. But a medical witness the parents provide will likely be one who would confirm their opinion that she didn’t have the physical ability or be neutral. So we’re left with the parents saying she had to have been abducted and the Malaysian professionals saying there is no evidence that she was abducted. What would Occam’s Razor indicate is most likely? I really can’t say.
The family has traveled places in previous years, think it mentioned going to see relatives - but have they been doing this type of travel, staying at a similar place - not a hotel or at a relative’s home? There’s a big difference between this resort and staying at a chain hotel.
The other piece of the puzzle we will never know - the siblings testimony. There is information about Nora that would be important about the trip, that evening, sleeping arrangements plus interaction on a daily basis with Nora. Much different perspective than the parents.
JMO