Here is a link to Monique's information http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/d/daniels_monique.html
The nose is very similar. Are there any other pix of Monique?
Trish
Here is a link to Monique's information http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/d/daniels_monique.html
The nose is very similar. Are there any other pix of Monique?
Trish
Just in case the ring on the necklace is accurate, I entered the initials in the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children in different orders to see what was there. I came up with a blond, blue eyed, 5'4, female missing from Oklahoma in 1992. The nose does appear different, but the initials are MCD. Sometimes Monograms appear with the last name larger and in the middle and sometimes people don't like their middle names and change them. Her monogram would be MDC. Monique Christine Daniels. It doesn't say if her DNA is entered in the National databases to be compared with our Jane Doe. What do you think?
Anybody here live in Phoenix? Maybe check out the local high school yearbooks for her & maybe a guy with those initials...
If the info was never posted otherwhere it is simply because no one has ever bothered before to do research on this case. But If you have 2$ you can buy the article then if you think the journalist has been lying you can write his hierarchy to tell them about your doubts.
Maybe the ME does some trafficking of jewels lol (though maybe it's true), but I don't see the journalist inventing such a thing.
No it's a paying article and it's forbidden to send them. I meant stole it after the article was written, it was written just three days after she was found, it gives ample time for the jewelry to vanish. I just launched ideas lol I don't think the ME would do that however that wouldn't be the first time sthg got lost. And when I said ME I meant anyone working there, ME's are probably well paid. But I just asked someone about it, I'll tell you if I receive an answer.
Wow - those are some serious accusations you're making. You really need to back up either the article that references this "ring" or your accusations that the ME or his/her representatives are thieves. YOU are the one who brought the information about the ring into the discussion here. As far as I can tell, there is absolutely nothing that supports this.