Haven't commented on this case, but I think I've lurked more than what's normal! lol
Anyway, I don't think the mother and father had ANY agreement about him taking care of Ayla while she was in rehab. If they had already agreed, why didn't she personally give the baby to JD before she left? Wouldn't that be more practical and easy for the child (i.e. JD could be given her clothes, her favorite things, etc). Why did he have to go to a police station and basically be escorted by them to get the child?
Secondly, she only filed for custody because HE was going to file? This turns off any speculation for me that JD did something to Ayla because he feared child support or losing physical custody. Aside from that, what court would give a child to a mother who is newly released from rehab and has no permanent address? Um...no. Unless JD had a long history of drug use or criminal activity himself, he is one father poised to make a really strong stand against custody being automatically given to a mother.
It's more likely IN MY OPINION that she was forced into rehab and had her children removed from her until she completed CPS' family services plan or whatever it would be called in Maine. That would explain the delay in her seeing the child, the so-called visitations, and the fact that the police reported that DHS "authorized" the father to take custody of the child. DHS or CPS as it is called in TX does not just place children with whomever is available---bio father or not. There are home studies, bond assessments, and such.
Like many others, I don't know what to believe in this case. The mother has been very inconsistent and the father has his moments. Something about the way the mother is very insistent on bashing the father is off-putting to me. I can understand why he avoided talking to her, no one would welcome the drama that she seems likely to bring. If she is acting like this is the public eye, how does she act when none of us are watching?
Lastly, about the grandma lying about being in the house. I think it's strange, but what if she was really in the home and the police have asked her to say she wasn't? They have been really guarding the identities of the people present in that home, and perhaps she made a whoopsie that had to be "fixed." Also, maybe the identities of those people are being protected because there is a reason to believe they will be endangered if identified. These things sound weird, but I'm wildly speculating at this point---because no solid info is provided.
Oh, never say these people don't seem smart enough to carry this out without being caught---Casey Anthony, Misty Cummings, someone in Baby Joshua's case, etc, etc...