Thank you!
I liked Forager's answer. It could be the age and/or sex of the kids depicted or an assessment that indicated the daughter was not a victim, and not likely to be, etc. it's quite hard to tell.
Supervision is typically ordered for sex offenders with kids or those accused of being sex offenders. And it's a safe option usually. But if the monitor is sympathetic to the offender/alleged offender, that's a problem.
You've been great to pitch in, Gitana1. It's been a help to get your expert take on it. Considering the status of the *advertiser censored* charges and visitation issues, it would lead one to question the motive behind Julia's murder. If the only POI still seems to be her step dad, could the motive be more than just hiding a proclivity for child abuse, rather could it be some lucrative illegal enterprise to go along?