If she has to testify about it the discrepancy between her statements to LE and to national tv (if any) could get her impeached.
You aren't under a legal obligation to tell the truth to a news reporter. MOO
If she has to testify about it the discrepancy between her statements to LE and to national tv (if any) could get her impeached.
It's apparently been confirmed the call went to voice mail so I don't see a need to speculate on her saying "I dont know who answered it" when her comment was taken out of context.
Absolutely.
You know - this is the kind of thing the public NEEDS to know to be able to help out. It's bizarre to me that LE didn't hold a press conference with this, along with information about where the call was made.
So this new information fits the conclusion that: DB didn't lie, it's probably the phone company's fault and it's just another coincidence of that night that the abductor just happened to dial the number of a person who had been in DB and JI's neighborhood?THANK YOU! That's so true. When you start from a conclusion and make all the new information fit into that conclusion, rather than putting all the pieces on the table and looking where that leads you - that's not how to come up with the truth.
I am still reeling that this woman is allowed to say she received a call from the Irwin's phone and she doesn't know who answered it. Why is she allowed to say that? ?? REALLY?
You aren't under a legal obligation to tell the truth to a news reporter. MOO
First of all, I don't see how you guys keep saying "Jersey Jersey Jersey" here. I don't see this 42 year old guy (and have you seen his mugshots?) with "stephanie" from "LazyTown" that appears to be close to half of his age.
I think if the number was mis-dialed there would be another call following that one to another number. Unless something happened right away to the phone.
IMO, she didn't have possession of her phone. Whoever had it, either answered it or the call went to voice mail and deleted. If she had call display on her phone, it will show who called the phone. If it was sent to voice mail the message may have been deleted.
In other words, she knows there was a call but no idea if it was answered or went to voice mail. She should know who had the phone though. If it's her ex or not.
Hope that makes sense. :crazy:
I cannot see any possible permutations of the following couples being likely: DB, Jersey, MW, and JI. If any of them were together/hooking up (other than the one married couple together), then they're among the oddest pairings I've ever seen lol. I mean, DB and Jersey?! Worse, JI and MW? MW and Jersey? ::waitasec: hoh:
I'm wondering if, given that MW looks to be early 20s? If maybe her "ex" is DBs brother, maybe the unidentified male teen in the neighborhood who had DNA taken, or may e she is friends with either of them. Those, to me, are more likely friendship/relationships than a DB/Jersey, MW/Jersey or MW/JI pairing.
Who the heck is "stephanie" from "Lazy Town"????
All this cryptic posting causes pages and pages of circling and mass confusion. I am soooooooooo confused!
I see what you're saying, but LE knows whether it was answered, and since she's been interviewed 4 times, my guess is, she knows whether it was answered. If she didn't have possession of her phone, then they need to find out who had it. If it was temporarily lost, this is something for the public to help out with. IMHO, this is it. This is the piece of the puzzle that will answer what happened to that dear baby, and it's being treated kind of like a clue that didn't pan out. If she really can't figure out who answered her phone, let the public help out by providing details.
IMHO. And now, I gotta go run errands.
Happy posting all.
I cannot see any possible permutations of the following couples being likely: DB, Jersey, MW, and JI. If any of them were together/hooking up (other than the one married couple together),
...
I cannot see any possible permutations of the following couples being likely: DB, Jersey, MW, and JI. If any of them were together/hooking up (other than the one married couple together), then they're among the oddest pairings I've ever seen lol. I mean, DB and Jersey?! Worse, JI and MW? MW and Jersey? ::waitasec: hoh:
I'm wondering if, given that MW looks to be early 20s? If maybe her "ex" is DBs brother, maybe the unidentified male teen in the neighborhood who had DNA taken, or may e she is friends with either of them. Those, to me, are more likely friendship/relationships than a DB/Jersey, MW/Jersey or MW/JI pairing.
I cannot see any possible permutations of the following couples being likely: DB, Jersey, MW, and JI. If any of them were together/hooking up (other than the one married couple together), then they're among the oddest pairings I've ever seen lol. I mean, DB and Jersey?! Worse, JI and MW? MW and Jersey? ::waitasec: hoh:
I'm wondering if, given that MW looks to be early 20s? If maybe her "ex" is DBs brother, maybe the unidentified male teen in the neighborhood who had DNA taken, or may e she is friends with either of them. Those, to me, are more likely friendship/relationships than a DB/Jersey, MW/Jersey or MW/JI pairing.
I wouldn't think so. Thing is, what if this was leaked and the media sought her out and caught her off-guard? She'd be compromising the investigation if she told who answered the phone so why not say she doesn't know.
The lawyers are fabricating tales to the media too for all it's worth.
JMO...speculation...I wonder if MW knows the people who live or hang out at the teen's house? (the teen that I am not sleuthing and we're not allowed to sleuth)
JMO...speculation...could be how she's "been thru the neighborhood" with her ex...
moo- I think le leaked this to give the parents some breathing room so that they'll come in and talk. Just a guess.
MW and DB??