Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As far as potential perpetrators of foul play - assuming it wasn't someone totally random or unknown person - I have been thinking Israel Keyes. He was listed as in the west during that time period, but the Midwest around then, and given his patterns it wouldn't be unreasonable for him to make that trek. Nor would it be beyond Keyes' MO.
Does a FOIA request need to be made locally?
As a collective...what are the most important questions we could ask?
Perhaps what condition the car was left in, i.e. doors open etc?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
As a collective...what are the most important questions we could ask?
Thanks, Chuck! I would want to see the transcript his father recreated of their phone call, condition of his vehicle once found (what a search yielded), and the details of any search efforts in their entirety. And why he was switched to vicap.
Wait, what do you mean, he was switched to VICAP? Was he classified differently earlier on ? Idk, TIA
Not sure - I thought originally he was not listed under VICAP and then you discovered he was. So maybe the better wording would be knowing the criteria his case met that warranted a listing under VICAP.
Would you guys be interested in doing a community podcast on this case? I live in Los Angeles, so it would be hard to reach out to folks in MN but just an idea to keep the dialogue going. I'm enjoying what Tim and Lance are doing with the Maura Murray case. This case would be a bit harder given the info we have to work with but we could dedicate episodes to theories and see where it goes. Would anyone be interested in doing this? I can record conversations over Skype and edit them.
Since I was awake most of the night I started thinking over the possible scenario of someone following / stalking Brandon that night. But this doesn't seem very likely because Brandon was walking along the road for a while, so whoever it was seems they would have gotten him then, before he left the road, even before he called his parents. Also, if Brandon had seen a car it seems he would have mentioned it to his father.
So if it was foul play, it seems like it would almost had to have been random. The search dog followed his scent a long ways, to the river, passed the river and then lost it right before the next road. It was just gone. Where did he go? Did someone come along then and take him ? I guess I'd better go find that again and provide a link. Brb
https://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:Jeff_Hasse/Missing_Person_Case_Study_--_Brandon_Swanson
Scroll down to the end of the last paragraph under the Thursday May 15, 2008 search.
" The dog was able to follow the trail until just shy of another gravel road" .
Although he does state the dog could just have been at the end of his "nose time" . I'm assuming they went back with another dog to try to pick up the scent from that point?
To the best of my recall the dog trailed for three miles and I dont think at that point they had another dog. I could be wrong, will need to listen to podcast again.
Would you guys be interested in doing a community podcast on this case? I live in Los Angeles, so it would be hard to reach out to folks in MN but just an idea to keep the dialogue going. I'm enjoying what Tim and Lance are doing with the Maura Murray case. This case would be a bit harder given the info we have to work with but we could dedicate episodes to theories and see where it goes. Would anyone be interested in doing this? I can record conversations over Skype and edit them.