Woe.be.gone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2008
- Messages
- 13,022
- Reaction score
- 225
I'm not sure what's going on regarding who is emailing what to whom about searches. Obviously peeps on WS, who don't live anywhere near NC, can't physically help to search for Kelli.
As far as anyone having egg on their face when and if the truth comes out, be sure you're sure you know who claims TO KNOW already exactly who is to blame for Kelli's disappearance. Most of us don't know the answer yet. Some people KNOW it is NH. If it turns out he is responsible, I don't think that by keeping an open mind until additional facts are revealed means one ending up with egg on their face. I'm not sure I understand the reason for that remark.
I'm glad to know that LE is working on the case and don't doubt that. They haven't revealed any new information publically, so there's no way for us to know if the investigation has taken any unusual turns or not.
It seems that engaging a professional formal search team for the task of finding Kelli, would be a wise choice and aid the searchers in covering more ground in less time. The current searchers are wonderful to keep on searching all by themselves and deserve our praise. Still, I question the decision someone made to forgo utilizing a search team that would accelerate the search considering their years of experience along with the special equipment that's available to them. I don't get it. Who made that decision? Just asking as the question has been weighing on my mind.
Why hasn't Kelli been located in the surrounding area of where she disappeared after months and months worth of searches that have taken place? What makes police so sure that she'll be found in the immediate area after all this time? If they're so sure, they must have more information but they haven't revealed it or charged NH with a crime against Kelli.
Not sure what the absence of information means but it leaves the case open for discussion. :twocents:
As far as anyone having egg on their face when and if the truth comes out, be sure you're sure you know who claims TO KNOW already exactly who is to blame for Kelli's disappearance. Most of us don't know the answer yet. Some people KNOW it is NH. If it turns out he is responsible, I don't think that by keeping an open mind until additional facts are revealed means one ending up with egg on their face. I'm not sure I understand the reason for that remark.
I'm glad to know that LE is working on the case and don't doubt that. They haven't revealed any new information publically, so there's no way for us to know if the investigation has taken any unusual turns or not.
It seems that engaging a professional formal search team for the task of finding Kelli, would be a wise choice and aid the searchers in covering more ground in less time. The current searchers are wonderful to keep on searching all by themselves and deserve our praise. Still, I question the decision someone made to forgo utilizing a search team that would accelerate the search considering their years of experience along with the special equipment that's available to them. I don't get it. Who made that decision? Just asking as the question has been weighing on my mind.
Why hasn't Kelli been located in the surrounding area of where she disappeared after months and months worth of searches that have taken place? What makes police so sure that she'll be found in the immediate area after all this time? If they're so sure, they must have more information but they haven't revealed it or charged NH with a crime against Kelli.
Not sure what the absence of information means but it leaves the case open for discussion. :twocents: