As far as arguments that seem to be simmering over, let me clarify a few things.
1. As a certified insider, VOH is the person I would trust the most as to assess feelings on a local, live basis with regard to the case, coupled with the fact that he has been demonstrably professional in his own dissemination in what he sees. that has helped me create my own critital thinking paths with regard to the case.
2. Even though I believe Nick Holbert is highly likely to be involved in Kelli's disappearance, I have never attacked his personal character. The only thing I have judged are his actions and his history. I don't think his "way" of talking or whatnot have anything to do with the crime. In addition, his sex offender status, while significant, is not the only factor either. His actions AS a registered sex offender, coupled with the reason he committed his original offense compared to other RSO's whose crimes have escalated in the past, as well as his being the last person to admit to seeing Kelli alive, and alone, has led me to believe about his guilt. But I don't judge him by the fact he acts "typically" like a criminal; that cannot determine the actual crime as much as circumstantial evidence and historical perspective can provide.
2. As far as Mike and Kelli's marriage: I was in the military myself and have seen the problems that young soldiers have in marriages. While we can speculate about the state of their marriage, of which I have no clue nor would have need to speculate, I can pretty much determine that Mike had nothing to do DIRECTLY with Kelli's disappearance. Whether he acted in conspiracy with others may be possible, it is highly improbable. But the point is that his actual marital status with Kelli, whether they were separated or a "time out" long weekend apart, or in fact happily married, is all irrevelent to the disappearance based upon every other public factor that any of us have been exposed to.
3. Same for Justin.
4. As far as other individuals, they may have had incidental contact with Kelli with regard to her marital status (extramarital sex). But this is a possibility, not an accusation, but something that would be an obvious point of investigation. Speculating on any interaction that Kelli may or may not have had, including behaviors with regard to either infidelity or other such contact, have not surfaced. Such information would most probably be publicly denoted in the investigation if it existed, in my opinion.
So to conclude, I do not look at the behaviors of anyone involved to be relevant as much as the circumstantial evidence coupled with any as-yet unreleased interrogations / interviews, and since this is not a game of Clue where everything is in plain sight, but rather a professionally conducted investigation where relevant data is not released, I think that getting mad or snippy only makes it harder.
Right now, my main focus is on Kelli's safety or situation. More specifically, that is how I feel. I ALSO note that had Nick been on GPS monitoring, as I have said before, LE would have incontrovertible proof on Nick's involvement, or lack of involvement, with no ambiguity, and their investigation would have been far easier. I also believe that had Nick been on GPS, this would also have affected his way of thinking, to the point where he may not have committed a crime because he would have known that LE would have been able to trace his every move.
This is why I believe a federally-imposed law should be mandated for all RSO's to wear GPS for at least their registration period (in Nick's case, lifetime). Think of how many victims would never be victimized on this tenet alone. Finally, RSO's must pay for their GPS, or as a taxpayer, I would gladly pay for their federal incarceration for failure to follow a condition of their registration. Either way, society is much safer.