desensitized
Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2013
- Messages
- 86
- Reaction score
- 74
another thing that strikes me as odd on the FB page is that IM being a former lawyer seems very naive and ignorant to laws and procedures. she rarely has ideas of her own, and when she does it's "does anyone know how bounty hunters work?" or "how can I get phone records?" I'm not a lawyer/former lawyer, I know the difference between a bounty hunter and a private investigator, and I know you need to obtain a search warrant to have access to someone elses phone records (no chance of that happening without proof of a crime).
I too think RM left voluntarily, I don't believe the scrap yard is important, northern is the bike. I wish I had the time and patience to go through the "facts" and determine when/how each was released. did IM ever really inform us of the missing bike? or was the information recieved through someone on one of the searches saying "oh, and IM said he MAY or MAY NOT have a bike with him"? and later IM just agreed with this (but never released that info herself?) and the scrap yard, still just a minimal transaction and we SPECULATE copper? was the scrap yard info released when we were also discussing the existence of serveilance video? did that draw our attention away from what COULD have been the most significant clue? are we only being given certain facts that appear to paint a picture of a family man in trouble, and any fact that contradicts that is discredited? (if I am to believe NCNY was verified, then I believe his posts.)
I too think RM left voluntarily, I don't believe the scrap yard is important, northern is the bike. I wish I had the time and patience to go through the "facts" and determine when/how each was released. did IM ever really inform us of the missing bike? or was the information recieved through someone on one of the searches saying "oh, and IM said he MAY or MAY NOT have a bike with him"? and later IM just agreed with this (but never released that info herself?) and the scrap yard, still just a minimal transaction and we SPECULATE copper? was the scrap yard info released when we were also discussing the existence of serveilance video? did that draw our attention away from what COULD have been the most significant clue? are we only being given certain facts that appear to paint a picture of a family man in trouble, and any fact that contradicts that is discredited? (if I am to believe NCNY was verified, then I believe his posts.)