Zero?? What are your theories thenI could be wrong, but I have zero theories that the cartel murdered these eight people.
Zero?? What are your theories thenI could be wrong, but I have zero theories that the cartel murdered these eight people.
I didn't see corruption as in stealing from the til, either, as much as just being, well, some of them were just not nice people (to put it mildly). I don't get a good vibe off of the PA either, at all, just for the record.
I could be wrong, but I have zero theories that the cartel murdered these eight people.
RAY, YOU'RE KILLING ME!!!
I'm beginning to lean toward the trigger happy cop. I couldn't believe that article stating the union said he had to be re-hired! I guess they don't care if he killed two people or not, as long as HIS rights are protected. I don't think I have ever heard of any union doing anything smart. But this is the biggest joke on the planet. I hope he gets sent to prison for a very long time.
The contract states that when charged with a felony, the employee "shall be placed on administrative leave without pay pending the resolution of the charges against the bargaining unit member."
Is the PA the one who "loaned" guns out? I mean, is that even legal? I'm not a gun owner but if I had a gun I wouldn't trust ANYONE enough to loan out a gun! I mean, what if they killed someone? I should be just as much at fault, or at minimum an accessory to murder if I loaned a gun that killed or hurt another person. MOO!
Zero?? What are your theories then
It can get trickyI bet nobody inherits that land. The state/city will probably end up seizing it since there was an illegal pot operation on it.
Even if they don't, the courts will assign an executor of the estate and that person will be in charge. All property and assets will be sold- the courts will then use that money to pay off any of the owner's bills or notices filed against the estate. You wouldn't believe how many things get filed against an estate. I can see this being a huge, tangled mess.
Once the estate stuff is settled- what is left over will go to the grandkids. Most likely some type of trust account. That account is usually managed by whoever is guardian of the kids. (not always) IMO, I think the court will probably assign somebody who is not a relative to be in charge of the trust for the kids.
This is a good reminder to people to make sure they have a will. Make sure your beneficiaries are up to date.
I just went through a very long estate battle in Ohio. :gaah:
The union has to do that..he can file charges against them if they don't..doesn't matter if they know he's guiltyRAY, YOU'RE KILLING ME!!!
I'm beginning to lean toward the trigger happy cop. I couldn't believe that article stating the union said he had to be re-hired! I guess they don't care if he killed two people or not, as long as HIS rights are protected. I don't think I have ever heard of any union doing anything smart. But this is the biggest joke on the planet. I hope he gets sent to prison for a very long time.
I could be wrong, but I have zero theories that the cartel murdered these eight people.
Cartel involvement is also near the bottom of my list of probable theories.
Revenge or payback is high on the list mainly because of the fact that 2 generations of one branch of the family was wiped out.
The one at the top of my list is the possibility of a failed relationship between the killer and one of the victims. The killer may have blamed many of the other victims for contributing to the relationship failure. This person would have been familiar to the dogs and where everyone was
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
This posting was in the middle of several posts that seem to indicate some relationship turmoil that may have been going on between Mar 2015 and May 2015. What I find interesting is that this post was made a year to the day before the murders and a DV meme that she set as her cover photo on May 21 2015. Just some food for thought."I really did love you, but you were a chain smoker and I was just another pack of cigarettes. "
Zero?? What are your theories then
Is the PA the one who "loaned" guns out? I mean, is that even legal? I'm not a gun owner but if I had a gun I wouldn't trust ANYONE enough to loan out a gun! I mean, what if they killed someone? I should be just as much at fault, or at minimum an accessory to murder if I loaned a gun that killed or hurt another person. MOO!
Yes, remind me of "our" theories again? 
I'm still pondering the possibility of one of the deceased being one of two.
Agree that it is probably a family issue...but I don't think relationship failure between two persons would, in the killers mind, justify ALL of the murders. I think that the majority of the victims were murdered because they knew the killer.....not necessarily his motivation, but (they) had to be silenced or they would talk. JMO The ISSUE is a puzzle, though. It may turn out to be a betrayal (real or perceived) or just greed. But these people were not rich and sophisticated, they were just living and making a living, to make do. JMO............The little 3 yr old is REALLY lucky to have survived.....