CSIDreamer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2015
- Messages
- 9,873
- Reaction score
- 79,850
If CR2 knew, then HR knew. Too close in age.
That leaves me with just Dana then. I wonder what the odds are.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If CR2 knew, then HR knew. Too close in age.
That leaves me with just Dana then. I wonder what the odds are.
Could you please expand, I am not sure to understand?
Years ago people would call in on a radio station I used to listen to, people would call in and say what was found at their grandparents, parents etc and say what was found after their death. Like one couple had a closet full of s&m stuff they were in their 60's Or like a friend who found her husbands deceased brothers underwear cut and blood stained from the fatal accident he was in. Someone else that was evidently a drug addict but no one knew. I guess what I am meaning is that it is a possibility that the grow operation may not have anything to do with the murders. jmo
I agree. I've been believing this from early in the case. Though to be factual, AG is not confirming or denying.
the way you wrote it first, one could read it like a threat. LOL. Read it again, it's funny if you're in dark humour stuff.
Years ago people would call in on a radio station I used to listen to, people would call in and say what was found at their grandparents, parents etc and say what was found after their death. Like one couple had a closet full of s&m stuff they were in their 60's Or like a friend who found her husbands deceased brothers underwear cut and blood stained from the fatal accident he was in. Someone else that was evidently a drug addict but no one knew. I guess what I am meaning is that it is a possibility that the grow operation may not have anything to do with the murders. jmo
Not sure I'd dismiss the drug angle. I mean, we have only a small fraction of the evidence at our disposal. DeWine, who has complete access to all the investigative reports, has said the crime is probably drug-related. The mj grow ops, I'm guessing, put some of the Rhodens in contact with some bad dudes. But at this point it's hard to be more specific. I could be wrong, of course.
I don't have anything to base this on, but I think they would have all known about the grow ops. And, I also doubt the executions had anything to do with drugs. I picture an intense, personal hatred by one person, who enlisted a helper. Maybe the helper agreed only if they didn't kill the babies? Just thinking out loud.
Also from the link:
Are you thinking IJ and his crew?I don't have anything to base this on, but I think they would have all known about the grow ops. And, I also doubt the executions had anything to do with drugs. I picture an intense, personal hatred by one person, who enlisted a helper. Maybe the helper agreed only if they didn't kill the babies? Just thinking out loud.
I agree about personal hatred. JmoI don't have anything to base this on, but I think they would have all known about the grow ops. And, I also doubt the executions had anything to do with drugs. I picture an intense, personal hatred by one person, who enlisted a helper. Maybe the helper agreed only if they didn't kill the babies? Just thinking out loud.
Are you thinking IJ and his crew?
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Thanks for sharing this Jax. As a family member of a victim of violent crime, I can attest to the fact that although we met with LE on a regular basis, very little was shared with us during the investigation even though no one in the family was a potential suspect. (LE knew who the perps were. The investigation was about whether her death was a crime or an accident). Just pointing out that LE not sharing much with the Rhoden/Gilley families isn't necessarily an indication that they are leaning toward family member/s as suspect/s. Up until this happened in our family, I had always assumed that LE shared details of their investigations with (close) family members of the victim. Learned the hard way that's not the way it works.
Note: I'm not implying the family members are not suspects in this case.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AG is usually careful and he says the perps knew homes - I agree it doesn't necessarily mean the family.
However if the perps knew the homes then presenting evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt will be difficult.
So imo, LE & AG are hoping for confession of at least one of the perp. This is why they are not sharing.
As for family members being under suspicion, it was also said. It could be a broad suspicion. Other people could be under suspicion as well.