Hi All,
I am just heart broken over this case,and it is baffling. I have one question and
if it has been asked,please forgive me. Why was no Amber Alert ever issued
in this case.I read where they say it did not meet the criteria but the criteria
is
1.child abducted
2.risk injury
3.sufficient info/(he was missing)
4.under 17 years old
What about this case did not meet the critieria.
So many things about this case I just don't understand.
moo
Hi there!
The guidelines are:
There is reasonable belief by law enforcement that an abduction has occurred. (It is very possible that they had reason to believe he wandered off and was lost, not abducted.)
The law enforcement agency believes that the child is in imminent danger of serious bodily injury or death.
There is enough descriptive information about the victim and the abduction (there may not have been any information about an abduction. Even today - 11 days later - it doesn't sound like the LE have much information about an abduction) for law enforcement to issue an AMBER Alert to assist in the recovery of the child.
The abduction is of a child aged 17 years or younger.
The child’s name and other critical data elements, including the Child Abduction flag, have been entered into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) system.