Thank you Neptune for the info. I am going to call Det. Henderson on Monday and ask WHY!!! I am tired of the silence and lack of press releases & lack of info on Namus and on & on & on!!!!
Unfortunately, unless there are new developments, LE will not keep the public informed regularly that this is an active case. They have many cases, and new ones landing on their desks daily. Working with the media and keeping the public informed is of lower priority than solving crimes and securing evidence. I believe we all get that.
But... I've seen two things that JCSO does that sets them apart from more sophisticated agencies -- and by sophisticated I mean professional, not necessarily larger. As an example, Benton County on the Brooke Wilberger case -- they were diligent about keeping the media informed. They are a small agency, but they understood what details needed to be released and when. They were careful not to give too much information, but enough to solicit the public's help and generate meaningful tips. I personally know that it was someone from the public who gave LE key evidence on the green van in Brooke's case – a "green van" is all the lead LE had, and they gave it to the public. Someone in the public acted -- found a camera near the scene of the crime, downloaded the video off the Internet that showed a green van and the license plate number, and gave it to LE… who were most appreciative. That evidence eventually found her murderer. A license plate number led to the body of Whitney Heichel. License plate info is critical.
One: When JCSO does release information it's too late and too vague. You can’t both ask for the public’s help and give them nothing by which to help you. There is no point in telling the public Stephanie’s SUV was driven late one night and early the next morning without giving the times or the timeframe. We get it -- her vehicle was driven that night. How does that information in any way help the public help you? There is also no point in releasing a photo of her vehicle a month after she went missing or without giving the plate number – unless Stephanie drives the only dark green SUV in the Ashland/Medford area and everyone in that area has exceptional memory.
This was “vagueness” by design.
Two: JCSO doesn't seem to understand that when information is already out to the public -- it's out! You try reeling it back in, change details, deny what is true, and you lose the public's confidence. It makes us wonder how well you’re handling the case. It makes us wonder if more brain power is spent thinking about how to control the public’s perception of the investigation than actually working the details of it.
If a law enforcement officer calls a trusted reporter with an update, do you think the reporter says “I can't talk, I'm busy”? No - they are always willing to talk to a valuable source. It's that easy for JCSO -- call them up, they'll listen and report what is told to them to the public. If what is given to the public is timely and specific, the tips going into the JCSO will be timely and specific. JCSO will be in a better position to solve cases.
I can’t imagine it goes like this in a closed-door conversation at the sheriff’s office... “We can give the public information on the make, model, and color of her vehicle -- but we just don’t have the funds to say her license plate number.”
These communication decisions have nothing to do with budget cuts!