Excellent, please keep us posted.Sorry I keep spamming the thread but I am going to submit Denise. The UID and Denise both have brown eyes, the same nose shape, and brown eyes.
Excellent, please keep us posted.
Wow. Somehow I missed this on my first few passes of this thread, but IMO it makes it even more likely that JD could be Denise Sheehy. Denise was 16 when she disappeared.ETA: I just noticed in the dentals section that the Jane Doe's dental age is estimated at 17.7 (plus or minus 1.8 years). This would tighten the Jane Does age estimate to somewhere between 15.9 years old and 19.5 years old.
Wow. Somehow I missed this on my first few passes of this thread, but IMO it makes it even more likely that JD could be Denise Sheehy. Denise was 16 when she disappeared.
Good work. I’m also trying to contact Othram/DNASolves since I’m pretty sure they were the ones who made the phenotype recon. I wish we hadn’t had this big realization right before a holiday weekend when they’re all out of the office, but every step forward is a good one!Well, I doubt that the lt. is going to reach out to me again since it is already the afternoon. Because of this I reached out to the Namus staff that is working on this case via email. I will let you know an update and/or if I receive and email back.
Good work. I’m also trying to contact Othram/DNASolves since I’m pretty sure they were the ones who made the phenotype recon. I wish we hadn’t had this big realization right before a holiday weekend when they’re all out of the office, but every step forward is a good one!
Good work. I’m also trying to contact Othram/DNASolves since I’m pretty sure they were the ones who made the phenotype recon.
I submitted Denise Sheehy to Doe Network as a potential match—someone on Reddit said that they may have better luck reaching out to the investigators than us.
Here’s hoping we can help give this poor lady her name back after more than 50 years, and give Denise’s family some closure. At the very least, it’s one more stone turned and one more what-if eliminated for both of them.
2999DFCA - Linda Lee Lovell
Linda Lee Lovell, 6/10/74
Westport, CA
View attachment 298866
View attachment 298867 View attachment 298868
I mentioned Linda previously in this thread, and I still see similarities.
I agree that Linda Lovell's nose does look different now that you pointed it out. I've followed her case (and Stephen Packard, her companion) for 5 yrs and when these new DNA images come out for unidentified women in her age range, I always hope it's her. I do know from previous research that Linda and Stephen were hitchhiking up the coast and were on a somewhat tight schedule for arrival in Missoula. Where they began to head in from the coast toward Spokane may have depended on their rides. And if this were Linda, then Stephen might be nearby, but undiscovered or in a different spot altogether. I do agree that Denise Sheehy looks the better match.
Maybe you should submit this possibility to DN too, Coleraine. There are definitely similarities. Even if she isn't as much of a dead-ringer for the new recon, it's still just a recon based on DNA and a skull. The circumstances would fit better than Denise's, and she hasn't been ruled out per Namus. Plus, Linda has DNA on file, so it would presumably not be too hard for them to make the comparison. I'm kind of surprised she hasn't been compared already.2999DFCA - Linda Lee Lovell
Linda Lee Lovell, 6/10/74
Westport, CA
View attachment 298866
View attachment 298867 View attachment 298868
I mentioned Linda previously in this thread, and I still see similarities.
Maybe you should submit this possibility to DN too, Coleraine. There are definitely similarities. Even if she isn't as much of a dead-ringer for the new recon, it's still just a recon based on DNA and a skull. The circumstances would fit better than Denise's, and she hasn't been ruled out per Namus. Plus, Linda has DNA on file, so it would presumably not be too hard for them to make the comparison. I'm kind of surprised she hasn't been compared already.