What I believe I heard was Judge Perry saying 48 hours in the mental health facility, not jail.
IMO this poor lady deserves a break, she obviously has issues. Not everyone is borne with the same advantages, and this lady looks like she has had a tuff life, and my heart goes out to her. I think the PJ would have been kept in spite of the outburst however she indicated she had been talking to a "man in all black" about the case while she was in the hall waiting to come back in, and this is why she was tossed.
Previous arrests....
2/11/2006 - Battery Strike or Touch
2/27/2007 - VOP for Battery
8/29/2007 - Possession of Cocaine, Possession of Paraphernalia, VOP for Battery
11/2/2009 - 6 Counts of Worthless Checks
http://www.pcsoweb.com/pages/who_jail.html
I don't know the extent of her mental health issues or drug problems, but one thing is for sure...she should stop acting like she had no clue how to behave in a court of law.
Good, it will give her 48 hours to think about the pitfalls of being a drug addict.
I'm pretty sure she said about the case. I'll see if I can't go back and find a link. I immediately though JP would summon the man in black into the courtroom and give him he$$ for talking about the case to this pj. But I could be in errorI didn't hear her say she was talking "about the case," only that she was in conversation with a man in black.
I'm not sure it was authentic. ADHD (with the H) vs. ADD, is almost always detectable before the age of six.
It's not something that shows up at age 14, although ADD can go unnoticed but doesn't usually entail outbursts.
She uttered a bunch of illnesses so it would sound good. :twocents:
That said, it's clear she has something.
They are reshowing her talking to the judge . First thing she says is she has never been in court before . She is just a liar
I'm pretty sure she said about the case. I'll see if I can't go back and find a link. I immediately though JP would summon the man in black into the courtroom and give him he$$ for talking about the case to this pj. But I could be in error
I'm sorry - I don't understand the sympathy for this woman. ICA obviously has mental issues - she killed her child. She's on trial and is subject to death. Just because you have a mental issue that does not give you a free pass - period. ICA may not be as "out there" as EJ, but not well in the head just the same (pathalogical liar, thief, killer). So what's the deal? Hey, why don't we just give ICA a couple days in the slammer. After all, this woman could have easily caused a mistrial and another million bucks to the Floridians had the jury been seated.
Just my humbling opinion.
Mel