Goodness... "Blue Tarp" and "Underwater" point to a limited number of local possibilities. Marsh Creek Lake, Blue Marsh Lake, Beltzville Lake, Green Lane Reservoir and Nockamixon. Had the family ever been to any of these locations? Marsh Creek has one easy access to the lake at Chalfant road runs directly into the lake and can be accessed at almost any time, day or night. Sounds like a job for someone with an remote operated underwater vehicle, like PSP.
Another body of water would be the lake at Atwater (right across from a quarry) on Route 29 . This is somewhat close to her house & not much fencing around it. But very steep cliffs there.
For those who aren't local - Atwater is a development that was/is being built overlooking an abandoned quarry. Here is a link to the website where you can see some photos of the area. It's not far from Anna's home.
https://atwater.thehavenapartments....MIgpnr7Pjv2gIVmInICh0Imge9EAAYASAAEgJWkfD_BwE
Completely agree. I don't understand all the secrecy and control issues that have surrounded this case. It's bizarre and frustrating. If you don't talk about it, people aren't going to know about it or be interested.The cryptic nature of that article bothers me more just a little. This case is sooo secretive. So many people know things that they can’t say. It’s frustrating. I wish we knew what most people were hinting at re: the person everyone suspects. Not for nosiness but to help put the pieces together. For instance, I’d really like to suss out what is “known” and what is “conjecture”.
That being said, I don’t think you can put much stock in what the child says. He was three when she went missing, and quite frankly, kids say lots of things. Yes, they are observant, but also, there is also imagination and confusion at play. There is too much room for error.
Of course the person that seems suspicious to most of us is acting bizarre. I would like to know this person’s behavior before any of this. Is he just bizarre in general? Is he “I am capable of murder bizarre”? It’s all tied up in innuendo to me.
I feel like I can’t get a gauge on this or do a deep dive because there are so many secrets and “we can’t say things but we’re going to make wink-wink suggestions” style reporting that it’s difficult to get a grasp on this. Until we are let in, and until there is any kind of firmer evidence (the neighbor remembers a tarp—but does s/he? Does this mean ANYTHING?!) or reveal of provable information, it’s all rumors and secrets that will keep this case stirring in the pot.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TONIGHT!! Just a reminder��
https://www.facebook.com/nbcphilade...H2JxRZPiqW9O9UYEPhcxf2Y83FRhikwLc-Tkfjei2xYaM
To save others time, this is just another link to the same video summarizing what we know and indicating this is a murder investigation.
There is conjecture that the child said "Mommy is hiding in the water". Does anyone know the veracity of this piece of information? In my head, I think a child may say that because he heard that people are looking for Mommy. If people are looking for someone, in a child's mind, it indicates that someone is hiding. So, "Mommy is hiding in the water" makes sense when he learns that people are looking for Mommy in the woods and in streams and ponds etc.
It doesn't mean much from a clues point of view imo.