aspiring drifter
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2010
- Messages
- 247
- Reaction score
- 119
At the 25 Feb 2011 status hearing, which occurred just 10 days after Dr. Krop's 3.5 hour examination of ICA, Michelle Medina served the following word salad:
http://www.wftv.com/video/26999580/index.html (@ 9:55)
MM: We have another motion with regards to a mental health expert and the mitigating factors in the penalty phase. This was a motion from attorney AF, who couldn't be here today. This is a request for approval of more costs. There needs to be more collateral interviews done with family as well as an evaluation and a couple of more visits that need to be made and were about to . . . .
JP: Is this with the confidential expert or is this with the mitigation specialist?
MM: No, the confidential expert, your Honour. And we're about to hit the $2500 cap. To avoid going over it we filed this motion.
JP: How many hours do you anticipate your expert needing?
MM: We requested another $4500.
JP: No, that doesn't answer my question. How many more additional hours, if you can tell me. I know you did not draft the motion. Ms. Finnell drafted the motion.
MM: I do not have that information with me because I know there would be travels involving visiting family members, immediate family members, as well as family members of the Anthony home and so I . . . I don't have that readily available but I can supplement that.
JP: I'm a little confused and maybe you can clear it up for me. I was under the impression that the confidential expert was gonna do an evaluation for purposes of determining whether or not there was mental mitigation or whether or not there were issues which are oftentime raised if someone is convicted in post-conviction relief that they may have suffered from some underlying mental illness that should have been brought to the jurors' attention: brain damage, some type of childhood trauma, or things of that nature, or to determine whether or not one may be competent or incompetent or suffer from various things. And what kind of threw me for a loop is when you start talking about family members. Most psychologists-slash-psychiatrists home in on the individual. It sounds like to me that you're utilizing this person as a second mitigation person when you've already had a mitigation [person].
i remember that. and when she started to give more...blah blah blah...he cut her off and said..."ya' know...i'm just gonna give it to you..." or words to that effect. that was when baez was late and i bet, i just bet is all, that he was hungover from his "unique" trip.