Weird how much time he is using on the clothes...seems to be sandbagging. Well he doesnt have much else.
I think the clothing is important. It is an example of how the plaintiff's theories are based off of lack of evidence as evidence of wrong doing. Specifically with the clothing the complaint falsely alleged several times that AS got rid of the clothing:
"Defendant ADAM SHACKNAI lastly set out to stage a suicide, and hide his involvement, first by removing and later disposing of the various articles of clothing REBECCA was last seen wearing publicly on June 12, 2011, in an effort to conceal DNA evidence and evidence of having stripped REBECCA of her clothing, laying out clothing matching Zahau's size including a white undershirt, black long3 sleeve t-shirt and blue jeans in an effort to divert attention away from her last known clothing in the inevitable investigation into REBECCA's death."
"Based on the facts that DECEDENT was found naked and that the clothing she was wearing on that date was not found at the scene of the murder, Plaintiffs allege that once inside the residence, Defendant ADAM SHACKNAI stripped off her clothing."
"Defendant ADAM SHACKNAI was careful to remove any evidence of his involvement, including the disposal of the tape used to initially bind her lower legs, and REBECCA's clothes that she was last seen publicly in on July 12, 2011."
Problem is, this did not happen. The clothes were there. This is why the conversion COA was tossed. It was completely baseless.