Ricki
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2010
- Messages
- 7,422
- Reaction score
- 1,198
-------------------
Juan is also having to tiptoe around the DT flagrantly trying to bring in residual doubt. We're not re-deciding the guilt phase here, as much as they'd like to make the jury question the original verdict. That's none of this jury's concern, and part of what makes the re-trial of just the penalty phase so problematic and frustrating. They want to make this jury question how/why she could have been convicted of M1 with the aggravating factor of cruelty. They're bringing in all this extraneous stuff which has nothing do with mitigating circumstances.
The jury instructions will be clear as to what is to be considered and not, and I'm certain that Juan will make things crystal clear to this jury as to what their job entails.
What pissed me off is that Juan can't bring certain truths because they are to prejudicial against JA, and they are proven facts such as fight in jail and smuggling things in and out of her cell, but the defense is allowed to blatantly lie about the victim and Juans witnesses. None of this paints an accurate picture.
Then the defense says lack of remorse is not a mitigating factor. It most certainly should be. I just don't get this.
One more thing that ticked me off is that her family went to the PP to see if they can sway the employees stories to fit her stories. Travis was right about JA turning out to be like her mom. No wonder they couldn't handle her. They helped her become what she is. I could give dad a bit of a pass and maybe the brother who outed her on why she posted the sex tape. Grandpa too, may he rest in peace. He tried to defend her by saying she was at work the day the murder took place, but it seems like he was devastated when he was proved wrong.