First of all, Good Morning everyone.
Today is Friday, March 14, 2014. The last business day before the Ms are set to appear in court.
Whew! I just caught up.
BBM
I fear this. I understand the SC law, but I fear how a jury will see it. If the defense argues that their client is also a victim, how will that play with the jury? I can only hope and think that the prosecution will see that coming and will have the evidence to refute that.
lease:
IIRC there is another SM that is unrelated to this case. Poor guy.
Thank you! Welcome and I hope you stick around. We're really not as bad as we seem.
LE needs to get on this black Jeep! How many times has it come up now? And how many can be registered in MB? These yahoos may be totally unrelated to the Moorer's. . .or not. But they seem bold and the situation can only escalate. MOO
Speaking about "where is Heather?" I had an unusual thought that hit me like a ton of bricks last night. I need to research some more before I'm ready to share though. Give me an hour. . .or several.
I also fear this.
I am not sure if it has been stated if they will be tried together or separately.
If they are tried separately, I would think that any competent defense attorney could get them off.
Lets face if. If there were two people there, the only way we will know beyond a reasonable doubt if they both *equally* participated is through a confession. And I don't see that happening.
Therefore each defense is going to try and put the blame on the other. And unfortunately, that is enough cause in and of itself to find reasonable doubt.
The defense attorneys don't have to prove their clients innocent, they just have to prove 'reasonable doubt'.
Maybe that's why (so far) it isn't a death penalty case. Maybe LE has a good idea of who committed the actual offense and how it happened, but can show that even though they may not particularly know who's hand 'did the deed', but they were both knowledgeable of what was about to happen to our beloved Heather.
To me, it makes sense. I feel a jury would be less likely to sentence one or both of them to death not knowing who actually took her life, but would be more inclined to hand down a sentence of at least 30 years knowing they both conspired in the plot.
This is why I hope what ever evidence LE has is solid as a rock.
Since we don't have Heather home, I think the only thing that could break my heart worse is seeing one or both of these (insert one of many explicatives here) walk away from this, free.
IMO, anything short of bringing Heather home and laying her to rest peacefully is unsatisfactory. And (god forbid if they hold out for that long) I hope its taken into consideration during the sentencing phase of this trial.
Please give us Heather back...
-Restless in Horry County
-JL
PS. This black jeep seems to be a reoccurring vehicle. With as much community support behind the Elvis's, I don't think it will be long before they pinpoint it. And I think they owner of the jeep isn't very bright (I won't go into why I think this), therefore I think that narrows down the field somewhat. IMO, whoever runs the TM and SM are innocent FB page, and the owner of this mysterious black jeep are either closely acquainted, related, or one in the same. I don't think LE will have to look too overly hard to figure out who this person is. In fact, they may already be on LE's radar...
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk