Cindizzi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
- Messages
- 10,924
- Reaction score
- 150,760
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A drug lord dealing with a vicious cartel. A recent example of that viciousness is the recent massacre in Goshen, Ca. In that case 6 people were killed including a 10 month baby. Horrifying.
…because murderers NEVER stage the scene to look like something happened other than what they did.
Closing arguments aren't evidence though so... I think all he can say is ineffective closing argument.This can't he far off appeal for inefficient counsel grounds?
I think the defense team drew straws for who had to close. JG must have lost.I don't recall JG appearing so stammering and jumpy when questioning witnesses as he is now.
moo
Yep, no way he checked their pulses turned Paul over, no blood on his shoes. Nothing transferred to him. MooOH GAWD....defense says: he is at his mothers, and the defense says he doesnt have blood on him...well how does one explain he had no blood on him after being in the middle of a bloody crime scene?
Sickening, isn’t it? I wont watch any YouTube lawyers again.Prediction. Talking heads will praise this closing.
Getting inside info from the defense team pays off for their YouTube channels. JG is all over the media.
There will be a multitude of posts gleefully claiming this closing was masterful! Even changed their vote from guilty to not guilty
MOO
Why in the world did Jim Griffin just concede that the shooter could've been on their knees? Did he forget that his own expert testified that a 6'4" person could not be the shooter?
I have a theory pulled straight out of “Ozark.”
So, I have been flip-flopping on guilty vs not guilty. There is strong evidence that he was at the scene briefly before the murders, and lying about that shows consciousness of guilt. Yet other pieces of the puzzle don’t quite fit. But how could he have been at the kennels but also not be the shooter? And if it happened that way, why wouldn’t he finally tell the truth?
I keep going back to all the missing money. I know he had an expensive opioid addiction, but that can’t explain all the missing millions of dollars. Where did it all go???
Was Alex, like Marty in “Ozark,” increasingly tangled up with some kind of mob or drug cartel? Was he no longer able to pay them off or launder more money for them, and they killed his wife and son right before his eyes with his own guns as a lesson? They could have told him Buster and other family members would be next if he ever dared say anything. There is a history of organized crime and murder in SC.
Just throwing this out there to the wind. Have I been watching too many “Ozark” episodes?