Kentucky Gal
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
- Messages
- 242
- Reaction score
- 0
loved that game.....I still make those for my kids...LOL
funny it never had a name....did it?
Posted this on the other thread right before it closed, so sharing here.
<respectfully snipped>
If for some reason, this jury decides on life rather than the DP, I fully believe the Judge will sentence her to LWOP. Here's why: JA has been found guilty of premeditated first-degree murder and seven of 12 jurors ALSO found her guilty of felony murder. The same jury also found that Jodi was guilty of murdering Travis in an especially cruel manner, making her death penalty eligible. Whatever some may think of Judge Stephens, she will not give Jodi the opportunity to walk among us as a free woman. She knows Jodi perjured herself on the witness stand, she is privy to all the shenanigans that went on in the sealed proceedings, she knows that Jodi has been "tweeting" through her minions, she knows (and has no doubt watched/read) about the countless post-conviction TV interviews. Most important of all, like the rest of us, Judge Stephens has not seen anything close to remorse from the mouth of Jodi Arias. If it comes down to Judge Stephens deciding on which version of life Jodi gets, it will be "without parole." I know that won't satisfy many people here, but I'd rather see a verdict from THIS JURY than have the Jodi show go on a day longer than it has to. MOO. Justice for Travis!
<heading to fridge to see if I have OJ>
loved that game.....I still make those for my kids...LOL
funny it never had a name....did it?
In the last thread, Rosemary Pierce said she was in a foul mood (I meant to comment on that but then came over here and forgot).
Must be something in the air because I'm about ready to stab someone in the face. Hopefully we get a verdict and it uplifts us all.
Whoa!!! Why does milquetoasty mean???
HLN is still spinning the "cannot agree" note that was sent to the Judge yesterday. Some claim there was an "If" that was left out. Using logic and considering my experience as a juror for a Murder trial, I will not believe this jury meant they could not reach an agreement as early as 2 hours into deliberation. They spent far more time deliberating a decision for the first 2 phases of this trial than 2 hours each. The logic is just not here. I am wanting to rip off the TH's heads!
So I just watched AP interview CMJA and she says she deserves a shot at freedom someday. Wow. This felon isn't even on the same planet I live on.
<heading to fridge to see if I have OJ>
I am comfortable in my belief that this jury will deliver a death penalty decision.
Surely this has been mentioned and I missed it because I just cannot keep up...
But did anyone else notice the Alexanders' body language yesterday during JA's allocution??? Almost every single one of them had their arms folded across their chest. Pretty telling, imo.
<heading to fridge to see if I have OJ>
In the last thread, Rosemary Pierce said she was in a foul mood (I meant to comment on that but then came over here and forgot).
Must be something in the air because I'm about ready to stab someone in the face. Hopefully we get a verdict and it uplifts us all.
Good morn all!!
At this point I believe the jury should be in the court deliberating during normal business hours 9-5. ALL FLIPPING DAY!
I am still in shock! Someone talk me of the insanity ledge!!!
I really hope you are correct about the judge. I kind of lost some respect for her the other day when she lifted the ban on the murderer giving interviews. I am still pondering what reason could have justified her doing so seeing as a jury is deliberating the fate of the murderer. Given the possibility of a hung jury and the requirement to seat a new one - just what the hello was this judge thinking ? Where is the logic in that ?
I'm not convinced she would give the murderer LWOP, not one bit.