YellowDog
New Member
When a person dies, they expell urine involuntarily. Could this be the fluid found at the crime scene?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just trying to clarify, as it's been posted twice differently, the first time it was 100,00.00 and I asked what amount was meant.............I believe she's saying $100,000 and simply put a period where she meant to put a comma...........a typo.
OR going back to the young men shooting in the area, maybe two of them were present in the area where the girls were but only one did the shooting. Then he took the other guy's friends and did the overkill, and so there was only one shooter, but two who were there, each with a gun. Then the one gun is dumped, and the other gun is sitting in a family cabinet locked away with an alibai. So it would be one shooter, with one witness, and the gun of the witness and the gun of the shooter were both involved. The witness could have either thrown up, or urinated out of fear. He can't say anything because his gun was involved. Out of fear he could have urinated during the overkill that he witnessed, or as pointed out in the thread, could have thrown up.
Be Aware! Several WS posters mentioned Websleuths over at Topix Weleetka - big mistake. There are a few Topix posters who are very rough around the edges, and abusive language flows from their tongues like there's no tomorrow. I'm guessing that they will be here shortly if not already here.
There are, however, Topix posters who are - like WS - seriously trying to solve this crime. But, like anything else, there are always a few who can't follow society's standards.
YD at this stage in the game nothing seems to be confirmed. I mean for weeks we are believing media & LE that Peter found Taylors cell phone & called 911. I am disgusted.
Has anyone come across Claudia Farrows maiden name?
I totally agree with you there. I just about had a fit when I heard th 911 call. Never once we were led to believe that Vicky made that call. How much more is being kept from the public. But why? Same with the DNA evidence. Was there DNA present and if so, why keep it a secret? Weren't we also under the impression that the Plackers were home? Either this case has been completely mishandled from the get go or OSBI has a pretty good clue on who has committed this crime and thinks they can flush the person(s) out by keeping secrets.
YD at this stage in the game nothing seems to be confirmed. I mean for weeks we are believing media & LE that Peter found Taylors cell phone & called 911. I am disgusted.
GS, I have my own theory about why the whole 911 call has not been released to the public. Perhaps Peter was on the phone first and maybe he accused someone of the evil deed calling them by name and was so worked up that Vicky took the phone from him. If he did give any names over the phone as suspects, they would not release that part of the call unless they were sure he was right about it. He also could have given the phone to Vicky when he saw Skyla's relative coming up the road so he could keep her from seeing the gruesome scene.
For what it's worth, I came across a Florida obit for Jack Suddarth who died in 1993. Listed among survivors is a daughter, Claudia Farrow of Weleetka, OK.
Or maybe he took the phone from Vicky after she called. Remember, when she called, the first thing you heard were the tones of the phone call and the operator answering. Then you heard her talking and screaming. So, she was on the phone first.
For what it's worth, I came across a Florida obit for Jack Suddarth who died in 1993. Listed among survivors is a daughter, Claudia Farrow of Weleetka, OK.