The Death of Wayne Millard

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Snoofo said:
Maybe the two shared a love for the races and the cryptic message was just written with a smile up to heaven. He may have had a quirky sense of humour (or had a few drinks in her honork...not to be offensive but it is possible).
Click to expand...

possbily - but imho i agree that the obits are both strange - they are not well written and the the animal welfare foundation goes from being a "foundation"
in EG's obit
http://yourlifemoments.ca/sitepages/obituary.asp?oid=503761

to a fund in WM's obit
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/thestar/obituary.aspx?pid=161695472#fbLoggedOut

could be a typo but strange imo
hopefully the links worked
 
disco2 said:
possbily - but imho i agree that the obits are both strange - they are not well written and the the animal welfare foundation goes from being a "foundation"
in EG's obit
http://yourlifemoments.ca/sitepages/obituary.asp?oid=503761

to a fund in WM's obit
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/thestar/obituary.aspx?pid=161695472#fbLoggedOut

could be a typo but strange imo
hopefully the links worked
Click to expand...

Could be that MB helped DM with obit. The way it is written could indicate that someone has English as a second language, hence the slightly different way of writing.
 
disco2 said:
possbily - but imho i agree that the obits are both strange - they are not well written and the the animal welfare foundation goes from being a "foundation"
in EG's
Click to expand...
(Quote snipped for space)
Yes that's true, I had a momentary relapse, forgot about that strange foundation. That alone is the oddest part. It's there for a reason and I can't think of a legal one!
 
In my opinion, sure okay...EG did exist.....but did she really die? My gut says she did not. My gut says that Obit posted 2 years after her alleged death was bogus and nothing more than: a) a way to solicit funds (though I don't know who would donate unless they actually knew her personally so then maybe that doesn't make sense that she really didn't die)...or b) as others have alluded to, the Obit was bogus but some kind of suspicious public posting (under the guise of an Obit) to send some kind of 'message' to someone. My gut says it's related to something illegal and criminal.

It wouldn't take anything for someone wanting to do this, to search Genealogy sites and "pick" someone to create a bogus Obit about. The fact that it was posted 2 years after she alleged died is a huge red flag that it's bogus, IMO. That doesn't even make an ounce of sense. And who knows whose pictures those were in the Obit......could be anyone's pics, just as long as they weren't pics that could be found online.
 
Snoofo said:
(Quote snipped for space)
Yes that's true, I had a momentary relapse, forgot about that strange foundation. That alone is the oddest part. It's there for a reason and I can't think of a legal one!
Click to expand...
Going through all these posts and trying to find the dates for the DNA stuff. WM & MB were estranged for at least 10 years from MSM reports that she had lived there for 10 years. That takes us back to 2003. In 2007, CF&F is incorporated and WM is listed as a Director. http://canadiancompanies.landoffree.com/company/Canadian_Flora_And_Fauna_Society, along with DM. Now, if I read the guest book message from MB, written a month after WM's death it does appear that they were still close. But, if I wanted to make a donation this Society or find out anything about it, like take out a membership or something, I can't find anything. Isn't that the intention of a society? However, a Society is a "not for profit" and once registered does provide legit tax receipts to contributors and if it has enough donations or membership dues could fund trips & expenses related to the society. Same with the EG foundation. ie. you donate 100K to the Society, you get tax receipt, Society funds trip to scour the fields of another country & it's not a taxable benefit even if you're the person who donated the money and got the tax break. Does it work this way?
 
Interesting link explaining "not for profits" in Canada http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cilp-pdci.nsf/eng/cl00691.html Members, Directors etc cannot get paid, but if they are doing anything on behalf of the "not for profit", they are entitled to be reimbursed. It comes back out to the "volunteer" tax free because it's simply a reimbursement of expenses. Most non profits have members and the Board of Directors have to account for assets, spending etc.
 
MsSherlock said:
Going through all these posts and trying to find the dates for the DNA stuff. WM & MB were estranged for at least 10 years from MSM reports that she had lived there for 10 years. That takes us back to 2003. In 2007, CF&F is incorporated and WM is listed as a Director. http://canadiancompanies.landoffree.com/company/Canadian_Flora_And_Fauna_Society, along with DM. Now, if I read the guest book message from MB, written a month after WM's death it does appear that they were still close. But, if I wanted to make a donation this Society or find out anything about it, like take out a membership or something, I can't find anything. Isn't that the intention of a society? However, a Society is a "not for profit" and once registered does provide legit tax receipts to contributors and if it has enough donations or membership dues could fund trips & expenses related to the society. Same with the EG foundation. ie. you donate 100K to the Society, you get tax receipt, Society funds trip to scour the fields of another country & it's not a taxable benefit even if you're the person who donated the money and got the tax break. Does it work this way?
Click to expand...

MB was listed as daughter in law in the obituary for CM in 2006.
http://woodstock.news.halinet.on.ca/954956/data
 
MsSherlock said:
Speaking of CM-Here's another obit that I haven't seen posted just for info The first one was the one in the G&M, but it's cut off, the full one follows : http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...hs+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca&client=firefox-a

http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...tm+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca&client=firefox-a
Click to expand...

It's still not full, it is cut off at the end :(

snipped and BBM
When Carl imported into Canada the Cessna Citation executive jet, the Department of Transport sent out a flight inspector to take him on a check rid
 
parcheesy said:
MB was listed as daughter in law in the obituary for CM in 2006.
http://woodstock.news.halinet.on.ca/954956/data
Click to expand...
And it also sounds like the woodstock obit was written by someone different than the G&M obit. One includes family and is quite normal, the other one names no one, appears to be author centric and gives no detail to funeral having taken place or anything.
 
canadiangirl said:
It's still not full, it is cut off at the end :(

snipped and BBM
When Carl imported into Canada the Cessna Citation executive jet, the Department of Transport sent out a flight inspector to take him on a check rid
Click to expand...
All that's missing is the "e" off the end of ride. That's the end. Second link may be informative for other reasons.
 
Snoofo said:
(Quote snipped for space)
Yes that's true, I had a momentary relapse, forgot about that strange foundation. That alone is the oddest part. It's there for a reason and I can't think of a legal one!
Click to expand...

I think foundations are private, much like Holdings, private trusts and the like'
When something is private it does not need registration JMO based on my readings.
 
MsSherlock said:
Going through all these posts and trying to find the dates for the DNA stuff. WM & MB were estranged for at least 10 years from MSM reports that she had lived there for 10 years. That takes us back to 2003. In 2007, CF&F is incorporated and WM is listed as a Director. http://canadiancompanies.landoffree.com/company/Canadian_Flora_And_Fauna_Society, along with DM. Now, if I read the guest book message from MB, written a month after WM's death it does appear that they were still close. But, if I wanted to make a donation this Society or find out anything about it, like take out a membership or something, I can't find anything. Isn't that the intention of a society? However, a Society is a "not for profit" and once registered does provide legit tax receipts to contributors and if it has enough donations or membership dues could fund trips & expenses related to the society. Same with the EG foundation. ie. you donate 100K to the Society, you get tax receipt, Society funds trip to scour the fields of another country & it's not a taxable benefit even if you're the person who donated the money and got the tax break. Does it work this way?
Click to expand...

This was incorporated July 18, 2007. It is registered as a business corporation as indicated by the RC in the business number. Therefore it is NOT eligible to issue receipts for money given to the corporation as a donation. It does not matter that "society" is in the name. Any monies received by this corporation would be considered business income and taxed as such. This is not a tax shelter, foundation, registered charity. It is setup as a business.
Proof it's not a registered charity:

http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/haip/...ORA AND FAUNA SOCIETY&s= &=Search&p=1&b=true&
Blomquist said:
I think foundations are private, much like Holdings, private trusts and the like'
When something is private it does not need registration JMO based on my readings.
Click to expand...

All foundations and trusts MUST be registered with Canada Revenue Agency and annual returns be filed.

MsSherlock said:
I believe it needs to be registered to be able to issue receipts for tax purposes. Here's the CRA explanation on charities types http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/chrts-gvng/chrts/pplyng/trcd-eng.html
Click to expand...

This is correct. Registered charities show RR after the business number on their donation slips issued. No RR equals not an eligible donation.

Edited to add: Elizabeth Glass Animal Welfare Foundation/Fund is also not a registered charity. I haven't found any information regarding it's existence.
 
Blomquist said:
Could be that MB helped DM with obit. The way it is written could indicate that someone has English as a second language, hence the slightly different way of writing.
Click to expand...
I have to disagree. Despite a few grammatical errors, the syntax is good. The content, selected information, is what appears off to me. For instance, this obituary for EMG tells us little about EMG, herself, other than place of birth and the fact she was a "proud aunt". Yet, the writer chose to include the occupations of family members.
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/th...lizabeth-mary-glass&pid=151480289#fbLoggedOut

The other obit contains details about EMG, but neither mentions interment. Customarily, obits published after the fact include that information.

One EMG says "her" foundation "was established", so presumably prior to her death in May of 2009, but the WM obit states "his last, still unlaunched...mission". So how long does it take to "launch" a charity, anyway? And if WM failed to do so before his death at the end of 2012 -- three-and-a-half years later -- why solicit funds for it afterward? Most importantly, why is there no official record of the charity?
 
CanuckSleuth said:
This was incorporated July 18, 2007. It is registered as a business corporation as indicated by the RC in the business number. Therefore it is NOT eligible to issue receipts for money given to the corporation as a donation. It does not matter that "society" is in the name. Any monies received by this corporation would be considered business income and taxed as such. This is not a tax shelter, foundation, registered charity. It is setup as a business.
Proof it's not a registered charity:

http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/haip/...ORA AND FAUNA SOCIETY&s= &=Search&p=1&b=true&

All foundations and trusts MUST be registered with Canada Revenue Agency and annual returns be filed.

This is correct. Registered charities show RR after the business number on their donation slips issued. No RR equals not an eligible donation.

Edited to add: Elizabeth Glass Animal Welfare Foundation/Fund is also not a registered charity. I haven't found any information regarding it's existence.
Click to expand...
Neither you, nor anyone else. Refer to the beginning of this thread. Members have searched and come up with nothing.
 
bessie said:
Thanks to Wondergirl for the heads up. The article says a backhoe was seen on the property.

Click to expand...

Just like every city kid says a farmer is "Plowing" even if he's pulling a planter, these city reporters think any piece of heavy equipment is a frakin' backhoe. The pictures coming through clearly show a Hough Front End Loader. It's not for digging holes, it's for moving piles of material. I have read here that the current search is centered on the area around the barn. In earlier pics, I saw some bales of straw strew around the entrance of one of the barns. I suspect the loader is there to clear the contents of the barn for the purpose of searching the ground beneath.
 
I have now seen pictures including a backhoe. Lots of heavy equipment on the scene
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 104 more.
Total: 1,885 (members: 105, guests: 1,780)

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
1,780
Total visitors
1,885
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
599,578
Messages
18,096,982
Members
230,884
Latest member
DeeDee214
Back
Top