Whisperer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2008
- Messages
- 17,542
- Reaction score
- 65
1. I don't recall an interview where CA said she febreezed everything. Not saying it didn't happen.
2. Which neighbor saw the car in the driveway with the windows/trunk open?
3. I understand CA said she washed a knife and pants. But she didn't have to offer that information at all. Why would she purposely wash evidence to take away any traces of decomp, then tell police about it?
I still don't get a strong vibe, and I don't see any proof, that the A's scrubbed out the trunk.
If you back and check the lady at the amscot, she stated she looked in the car and it was a 'mess".
Any normal person would have thrown the smelly pants away.....so you have to ask why didn't Cindy?....simple...she was unsure if the towyard inventoried car. The pants were obvious and the knife could be seen so she only gave back what she was "sure" other people saw by looking through window.
She did not want to throw away 'evidence', as it may get retrieved from garbage by LE, so she got rid of the evidence by washing probably multiple times. Anything important that was lying underneath clothing or in cases is gone....bet the ducktape was there. Lots of good evidence in paperwork also that was left in the car.....that Cindy got.
Well, the A's did clean because there were maggots hanging around in the trunk...you can bet your bippy it was cleaned. All critters gathered up in shop vacuum.
Apparently the towyard doesn't inventory....but Cindy did not know that...simply CYA...what she does best.