Jennings opinion on defendant between 11 - 17 was on her truthfulness, he felt she had lied and was still lying...came out of Grand Jury felt that she lied under oath and immunity was then off the table. He said she lied under oath "we were done".
Jennings didn't believe that Chris was not brought into the house, didn't not believe Boyd was not involved, all the things Coleman was saying, trying to minimize involvement.
After her grand jury testimony, Jennings was convinced that she lied during her grand jury testimony and after that immunity was off the table. He nails this point. Then, he gives specifics of what he thinks she lied about it. The choice to call this witness is going to backfire on the defense.
Defense up again - asking if she was under oath and when.
Wants to know what she lied about with the Grand Jury - The defense wants specifics - Jennings points out Cobbins involvement, he goes to say she was protecting...then got cut off.
Jennings states tiny house, no one could not know what was going on.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.