Not being argumentative with you personally but I would like to use your
post to clarifiy my own position on this issue. I hope you won't mind.
The blood on the lunch box was mentioned by one and only
one person - Joe Gomez, a radio show jock, not even local, but from
Houston who appeared on Nancy Grace as one of her talking heads. . .
(Snipped for space)
Sure. I also have my doubts about any info that come from the NG show.
This is not the first websleuths case that I have been involved in
discussing where that show has gotten info wrong.
I don't have any problem with someone saying they doubt such a source.
I too doubt them but what I
do have a problem with is someone saying
a report truly is false as if they have inside knowldge to make such a
statement. That is quite different than saying they disbelieve the report.
Making a declaration of fact is quite different than stating an opinion
of disbelief.
So I ask how they
know such information is false.
On what basis can they declare it to be incorrect, not as an opinion but
as if it is fact based on their knowledge.
I linked my source when using the information and I know that when camo
clothes were falsely reported to have been found that news articles came
forth that debunked the rumor (citing LE as sources.)
So if they have similarly debunked this information then someone could
rightly say that LE or other MSM news article has debunked it and they
could cite or link their source.
But if no one (LE,or other MSM news article) has proven the info false the
most we should rightly do is to doubt the info and not
declare it to be
false when in fact we do not
know if it truly is false or true.
Blood on the lunchbox/bag is not even all that important to anyone's
theory so far as I know. I think if she was carrying something and was still
bleeding then it is possible for blood to be on that object but I don't
care one way or the other if blood was there or not.
Perhaps I will post in a separate post about what I think of the chances
of the info from the NG being correct or not in this particular instance.
For now I just wanted to clarify my position on this other aspect of
things.