jillycat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 2,746
- Reaction score
- 11,841
The dismissal was dismissed as "nolle prosequi"
The normal effect of nolle prosequi is to leave matters as if charges had never been filed. It’s not an acquittal, which (through the principle of double jeopardy) prevents further proceedings against the defendant for the conduct in question. Rather, at least when it occurs before trial, nolle prosequi typically leaves the decision of whether to re-prosecute in the hands of the government. If the prosecution decides to bring charges again—for example, after it’s gathered more evidence—it must file a new charging document. (People v. Daniels, 187 Ill. 2d 301 (1999), Kenyon v. Com., 37 Va. App. 668 (2002).)
Yes, but my understanding is that both nol pros and dismissal can be with or without prejudice, and if it's 'with', there can be no future charges.