Am I the only one that believes that there was a rope used for tying to the bed? Only I believe that Jodi tried tying TA to the bed as her first attempt at getting him into a vulnerable position (and also was the one to cut the rope in the bathroom). I think that was her original plan on how she was going to kill him. When she was ineffective in securing him well enough so that he couldn't just slip out of the knots, she had to come up with another plan. It just make sense that she would have used sex in her plan to get him into a defenseless position. Because it didn't work is why she had to stay longer until she could come up with the shower posing idea and get him to go along with it.
Another issue... I'm still trying to figure out how ANY of Dr. Samuels testimony matters even if it was an accurate diagnosis. Because she may have suffered some psychological affects POST / AFTER / FOLLOWING / SUBSEQUENT TO committing premeditated murder doesn't diminish the responsibility for the heinous and brutal crime! Even Samuels has repeatedly stated in testimony that these symptoms are common in 30% of murderers. She planned to kill TA, and then brutally did so. I don't really care if she claims stress related amnesia or PTSD as a result of her own actions. If she didn't want these problems, um, don't kill someone! Besides the fact that I don't believe a word that has come out of her mouth and, therefore, not a word that comes out of a self proclaimed expert that bases his results on those known lies. But am I missing something? Is there really anything about this testimony that should even matter to a jury?