gitana1
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
- Messages
- 29,423
- Reaction score
- 230,605
I had to post this. Someone asked about prepping vs coaching. Check out what this attorney says and apply it to Laviolette:
Although some law firms prepare information for experts that explains the importance of giving honest and truthful testimony, Ambrogi found a number of attorneys who emphatically instruct expert witnesses to always tell the truth. Mr. Friedman, for example, finds it important to explicitly define the role of a witness to the expert. I tell my experts straight up front, Youre not an advocate. I want you to just answer the questions. If I think theres material that needs to come out, youll have to trust me to bring that out.
http://www.ims-expertservices.com/blog/2011/attorney-ethics-witness-preparation-vs-coaching/
I said last night- the more this witness is provided with evidence that she's wrong, the more entrenched, unreasonable and stubbornly grasping onto the ridiculous, she will become. It's called cognitive dissonance. Like what cult followers go through.
Although some law firms prepare information for experts that explains the importance of giving honest and truthful testimony, Ambrogi found a number of attorneys who emphatically instruct expert witnesses to always tell the truth. Mr. Friedman, for example, finds it important to explicitly define the role of a witness to the expert. I tell my experts straight up front, Youre not an advocate. I want you to just answer the questions. If I think theres material that needs to come out, youll have to trust me to bring that out.
http://www.ims-expertservices.com/blog/2011/attorney-ethics-witness-preparation-vs-coaching/
I said last night- the more this witness is provided with evidence that she's wrong, the more entrenched, unreasonable and stubbornly grasping onto the ridiculous, she will become. It's called cognitive dissonance. Like what cult followers go through.