wow! Jw has found something to try and make dr d look bad. She shared copyrighted material to someone who isn't a psychologist. Now the jury won't believe her anymore.
Oh for the love of Pete. She reviewed copyrighted info with the prosecutor.
Give it up if that's all you got, Willmott
There is NO law against reading copyrighted material. What is the point, counselor?
Pretty sure the defense looked at it too![]()
Really JW, you should just say "I have no more questions of this witness" and sit down before you do any more damage.
Good lord. I thought JW could do better than this!
I respectfully disagree. If it was you on the stand and some lawyer were throwing these barbs at you and insinuating you were unqualified due to your age and/or experience, you may appear impatient as well. Thank you.
As a former employee of Pearson Assessments, you are correct!
![]()
There is NO law against reading copyrighted material. What is the point, counselor?
Oh for the love of Pete. She reviewed copyrighted info with the prosecutor.
Give it up if that's all you got, Willmott
HA HA! Great point, I wish JM would have pointed that out. He is being unusually quiet today but this witness is holding her own and then some so I guess he is just letting JW sink her already sinking ship further.