ThinkHard
Former Member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Messages
- 3,272
- Reaction score
- 16
Hello!
Just a few more scattered thoughts. I find the current discussion fascinating.
Ive gone over this same question in my head several times. Why would she go into that area alone when its clearly so spooky? But now they are saying she was dragged to that spot, and actually was killed a distance away.
The only explanations I can think of is that she was probably suffering from jetlag and overlooked the cues that wouldve alerted her to impending danger.
That and being in an unfamiliar environment. Perhaps her sense of adventure overrode her personal safety and she simply failed to be cautious.
A degree of anxiety comes along with traveling, either from air travel or fearing the unknown. Maybe with the 21st being her last day there, she felt as though her anxiety and worries were all nonsense since until then nothing had gone wrong in her trip. This might have made her more willing to chance a quick trek into those ancient city walls.
Besides, would being in a strange country not overwhelm ones senses at first? She had been there only a few days, definitely not enough time to acquaint oneself with the ins and outs of an entire city.
Moreover, it was her first time anywhere outside the US. She was there for her own reasons, and was enjoying this new sense of freedom.
We see what we want to see. I was once told an anecdote about two menone a hunter, and the other a missionarywho had just returned from a trip to Africa. One of them said he never saw a single church there but that he had seen hundreds of lions. the other said he had only seen churches there and never saw a single solitary lion.
All Im trying to say is its very possible, for an unknown reason, she went to that area of her own free will, not seeing the danger, and stumbled upon her killer(s).
The confusion regarding the videos could be an innocent mistake. Such blunders reflect badly on law enforcement but after all they are only human. It can also be due to poor video quality.
In the end, the fact remains that law enforcement tracked the woman in this video and it led them to Sarais body.
With that said, I find it rather difficult to believe that the killer hired some woman to masquerade as Sarai, determine where and when to make herself visible on camera, used the surveillance system itself to direct law enforcement to the body.
It just seems like too much trouble when the killer could just as easily have discarded of her remains in a quicker and more efficient way.
This cloak and dagger stuff would just bring unwanted attention if you had just killed someone. First the killer would have to worry about the connections hed make. The more people connected to the crime, the higher the chances are that you will get caught, because after all, the woman you hire, or whoever else, will someday talk. Honestly speaking, how many people can a killer and associates trust with this type of responsibility?
You will have to not only figure out a way to get rid of this body, or create some story to draw attention away from yourself, but you will also have to kill anybody else you get involved. In such cases, if youre the killer, you will either not tell anybody, and take the secret to the grave, or do a whole lot of unnecessary killing.
Plus the question of time. She was last seen alive on the 20th by the man from whom she rented a room. The kind of decoy story being suggested here could not be carried out or planned on such short notice. Sarais last steps would have to be known, how she dressed, how she walked and so on, otherwise your attempts to fool police will be in vain. This is why I think lots of time would be required to pull off something of such great scale.
I tend to believe her murder was random, because to think otherwise only complicates things. A lot of evidence points to this, such as similar attacks in that same area.
I really think some people here have been sidetracked by small details.
Excuse me, dont wish to ruffle any feathers.
Of course these are just speculations, I can still be wrong. I admit with the way things stand now, anything is possible...
Thanks!
Jet leg? From what she'd already been in Europe for almost 2 wks at that point. She wouldn't have been suffering jet leg 2 wks in to her trip. And I know she just got back from her Amsterdam Munich trip but I'm fairly certain that is only a 2 hr time difference from Istanbul, and a 2 hr time difference would hardly cause jet leg.....
Sorry let me go finish reading your entire post.