Thanks for that. I’m glad it can be talked about since official records confirm it.
With regard to the disputed, or rather, “unapproved” source, after looking it over I don’t really get the objection. It’s a fairly anodyne local online source, with normal reporting, a lot of it aggregated news from larger sources, and the particular local information objected to cited was link sourced from an official open records database, and it published many weeks ago.
Of the two arrests reported earlier- the Feb 8 and April 27, , the April charge remains as an active Misdemeanor in the open so database, with particulars confirmable. After the sworn complaint this week date-matched the original incident date listed there, there was good reason to think that was REAL news, even if later record was expunged, and that someone had called for authorities - or at least not to immediately believe no call had been made on 2/8/21