No.Are those videos sold to the DailyMail time stamped?
No.Are those videos sold to the DailyMail time stamped?
The lawyer didn’t say that. That is a sensationalized headline.
That is correct.I said this up thread, but I think the second burglary and “injury to child/elder/disabled” were related to the February incident and the injury charge was to gpa, and none of the kids involved at all.
I don't think that argument will fly with a jury, JMO
The lawyer didn't say it’s not him in the video’s.I don't think that argument will fly with a jury, JMO
There is no indication of a psych hold.If he was detained on a psych hold, he may have been unable to sign the first one due to being in the safety cell or the restraint chair.
i cant find the link again, but it was indicated that he was detained after the incident in Feb and then released to metro or something when no charges were filed. but these links disappear and update so quickly, who knows what is true.There is no indication of a psych hold.
Do you have a link to what the lawyer did say then? TiaThe lawyer didn’t say that. That is a sensationalized headline.
Im not disagreeing with you I’m just wondering... if he wasn’t acting alone, do you think he would have ratted his accomplice out by now? What do you think is going on there?
I don't think that argument will fly with a jury, JMO
Again. He did not say he is not the man seen in video.
Oh, my gosh. Thank you.I think what you mean is that DB is claiming it's not him seen in the video. Just added an extra "not". In the article, DB's attorney says that DB told him that it isn't him in the footage, and that he didn't kill CG. Just want to clear that up.
Oh, my gosh. Thank you.
The perils of posting from a phone while distracted.
Actually it's not at all odd for killers to deny being on video.It was obviously this creep on the video and I don't get why some defend him.No problem. I only added confusion - it was clear what you meant!
Long story short: DB told his lawyer that he is not the person seen in the released footage, and that he didn't hurt Cash. Side-by-side, the mugshot compared to the still image from the footage look similar, but I can't say it's 100% DB. As I mentioned earlier, I'm not sure DB knows the entire story himself. The fact that DB says it's not him in the video - his attorney must believe that at the very least, a case can be made. Seems strange to lie about that part. I wonder how much DB has said to LE. Just thinking. Justice for CG.
I have ‘t heard anyone even vaguely defending him yet. Or do you mean his attorney? Everyone is entitled to legal defense.Actually it's not at all odd for killers to deny being on video.It was obviously this creep on the video and I don't get why some defend him.
The lawyer didn't say it’s not him in the video’s.
That is a sensationalized headline.
Ha! Thank you!No problem. I only added confusion - it was clear what you meant!
Long story short: DB told his lawyer that he is not the person seen in the released footage, and that he didn't hurt Cash. Side-by-side, the mugshot compared to the still image from the footage look similar, but I can't say it's 100% DB. As I mentioned earlier, I'm not sure DB knows the entire story himself. The fact that DB says it's not him in the video - his attorney must believe that at the very least, a case can be made. Seems strange to lie about that part. I wonder how much DB has said to LE. Just thinking. Justice for CG.