Circleoflife
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2014
- Messages
- 181
- Reaction score
- 4
He was invited by SB and PP.It also makes me wonder why he was invited there that night.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was invited by SB and PP.It also makes me wonder why he was invited there that night.
I see this case very simply now.
I think he acted alone.
I don't think it was pre-meditated.
I don't think drugs are involved.
I think something happned to make her willingly get into his car, and this is when something has happened.
I think he dumped her body before going to work the next morning.
I think he has simply 'got lucky' as such with where he put her body.
The only other arrest I think could get made is if someone lies and gives false evidence or an alibi etc... But only time will tell.
I don't think this is a drug cartel, drug arrangement gone wrong and he's too scared to speak up.
He knows what he done with Christina. He knows why her DNA is in the trunk of his car.
I absolutely believe drugs were involved. IIRC even the PI the family hired felt that. The last text sent by either CM using EA's phone or sent by EA was about drugs. I think they will play a big role in this but JMO.
I absolutely believe drugs were involved. IIRC even the PI the family hired felt that. The last text sent by either CM using EA's phone or sent by EA was about drugs. I think they will play a big role in this but JMO.
I wonder if they try using the SA conviction (if they do convict him), it could possibly be considered too prejudicial and be tossed out?
I just think the 'good rock' text from a random number was simply to try and get HF's attention, that she was so desperately trying to get.
Obviously drugs were a part of the night, an CM's and EA's life.
I just don't see them being part of her disappearance.
One thing they do not have is a "smoking gun". DNA/blood in his trunk only goes to prove she was there at some point, but not necessarily dead. They obviously have no weapon. They have no confession. They have no witnesses. No crime scene. No body. No way to prove he was even present at the time she was murdered. And "guesses" won't get them very far with a jury. What they do have at this point is reasonable doubt. They have a lot to overcome. This is not the "slam dunk" some believe.
And there have many changes in those forty years. I am a contemporary of the period of which you speak, and I can assure you that in that era (60s, 70s) so many legal, cultural and societal changes happened as to make today's world practically incomprehensible. Among those changes: The second wave feminist movement, more young women began working outside the home after marriage (droves, in fact), changes (though far too slow) toward racial equality, a culturally challenging and divisive war (Vietnam), effective and more widespread availability of birth control, the beginning of global corporatism and the decline of American real wages. One of the most societally challenging of these changes has been in the relationship between men and women, and whether one argues that this change was good or bad, the need of women to achieve financial independence and the ability to support children on their own. Having two or three children before the age of 21, vastly handicaps that possibility, and so the state steps in. The Romeo and Juliet laws are a realistic, yet imperfect, attempt to address that problem. They arose from the disparate but parallel efforts of social conservative, fiscal realists, and second wave feminists and victim rights advocates to a change the law protect young women from being exploited sexually by older men. Politics does indeed make strange bedfellows.
IMO The girlfriend/housemate of a drug dealer would NEVER text him on a private phone anything having to do with drugs. She would know better.
It also makes me wonder why he was invited there that night.
IMO The girlfriend/housemate of a drug dealer would NEVER text him on a private phone anything having to do with drugs. She would know better.
I agree with this. BUT we don't know that this number that HF was using wasn't used for sending/recieving drugs texts and phone calls.
I might be wrong on that though?
IMO the only reason the night has any significance is because of what happened at the end of it.Excellent question! I also wonder why Christina was invited there that night. She wasn't necessarily BFF with these people either. They were high school friends for the most part and also better friends with her EX, not necessarily her current significant other.
IMO the only reason the night has any significance is because of what happened at the end of it.
I don't think it was a special night at all, some HS friends decided to meet up, nothing out of the ordinary at all
JMO
Now that's just nasty! [emoji1]Even ones that fall off of feather dusters? :drumroll: LOL
Exactly my theory, for what it is worth. I think HF is a separate issue...i.e "bad boyfriend" etc...but not a factor here, other than Christina may have stayed in FW if she and HF had been getting along better, therefore avoiding this gathering. And for me, EA's motive was likely the result of not getting what he wanted. Jmo
Sadly (and inexplicably, IMO), CA wasn't found guilty, but that didn't mean there wasn't a ton of evidence against her. My point was that the evidence against EA (for Christina's case solely) isn't insignificant. Plus, LE likely has much more that they haven't made public. Of course that doesn't mean EA definitely will be convicted, as a jury's verdict is anyone's guess.Aren't those things (plus a whole lot more) they had on Casey Anthony, too?! She walked on Murder 1 and he is only up on AK so far.
PPD and the DAs better hope the evidence continues to pile up against EA if they want this case to hold up in court when it lands in the Jury's lap to be decided. He was last seen with her is not going to be enough for a conviction and having her blood/DNA in his trunk may not either.
They are grasping to prove he abducted her with force out of the parking garage as it stands right now. They have a shaky motive, an extremely narrow window of opportunity, and no weapon. They better come up with a lot more evidence.
I dont think HF is involved but is the REASON.