My other catch up post... I will be so glad when my freaking shoulder is better. :banghead:
Haileys ipod touch....why can't anyone give a straight answer about it? And, why was NG answering the question about it last night. The ws caller asked the question. Does NG know the question before the caller goes on the air? If so, did she ask Billie about the itouch and Billie told NG it was a knock off and broken?? Billie supposedly told her friend who posts here that the itouch was lost a few days before Christmas....again, why no straight answer?
I do not think people realize how important this could be.
It could contain information about who, where, what, when, why.
And it could have GPS on it that could lead us to Hailey if she in fact has it with her.
If it was lost and still is, then no one knows whether she has it with her or not. Even if the battery is now dead, it could be a lead as to where she WAS.
I do not understand why those two facts are so unimportant in this case.
It is beyond me. I have to hope that LE already has the device and is maybe using it for leads and doesn't want people to know they have it. But if that's the case why not simply say she left it behind in her room and it was broken?
I don't necessarily see that as being inconsistent. We don't know that the son didn't call the dad first, before Billie also contacted him. KWIM?
I think this is a matter of perspective.
Billie calls Clint FIRST and asks him if Hailey is there and if he's seen her. He says no. She doesn't say "OMG she's missing." She hangs up and calls other friends and family first.
Then Billie reports Hailey missing and D*** actually tells Clint that Hailey is MISSING.
yeah, I've thought of that. It would take balz, but if you're guilty of something a lot worse than lying, then I guess the nerve could be mustered. She said that she trusted LE & they trust her. How can that be? Somebody's lying on somebody. If cops lied on me, I'd be done with them. I'd lawyer up, hire a private eye, & demand that somebody else, find my daughter.
Where is she supposed to get the money to hire a lawyer OR a private eye? :waitasec:
I understand what you are saying about comings and goings and not remembering who was where when. I am notorious for not remembering things.
But...if my daughter were missing, you can bet I would sit everyone down who I could remember had been in or out of the house and would say...
"Now, Jamie...you were here the afternoon that Ryan stopped over after basketball, right? Which day was that?" "Who else was here that day?" By the end, we would have it all figured out and would likely have a pretty accurate timeline based on responses like, "No, mom...he stopped by the next day. It was Paul and Scott who came by when I was here."
That sort of thing.
Even if I, personally, had not remembered all of the details, we would have been able to put the puzzle together...and in a whole lot less than two weeks.
But that would be your daughter missing.
Not your boyfriend's 13 year old daughter who does not live with you, who may or may not still hate you like she did when she found out you were pregnant.
It does not sound to me like Hailey and N**** were real close. I don't think Hailey babysat her little sister so N**** could shower or anything like that.
I think it's entirely possible that N**** didn't even notice if Hailey was there or not.
That appears to be a very high concentration of RSOs for a town of that size. Based on that I am betting that they did not have some of the RSO rules that larger cities have like RSOs can't live within x feet of a school, park or other place where children frequent. If that is the case, it would make CC a more "appealing" place for an RSO to move and not have to be so selective about where they can actually live.
Different states have different laws. If you move from one state to another then your conditions will change when you move. So if you were given 5 years of supervision in one state, then move to another that has lifetime supervision, you will have lifetime supervision.
Texas has the 500 feet rule... they can't be within 500 feet of any place where children are known to congregate. They also have 10 year and lifetime supervision. That's a lot. Romeo juliet, peeing behind a building... etc will get you 10 years of registration...
So in the long term, Texas has some of the harsher registry requirements. What is interesting to me is that with that high of a concentration of RSO's, there is an almost no rapes or murders there.
I have a question regarding the visits to the jail, which I believe someone said take place on weekends. Are these visitations strictly for direct family members of the incarcerated, or for anyone associated to them?
I keep thinking of an acquaintance of someone in HD family/network OR someone associated with a person in jail....that may be been in town that weekend.
Generally anyone who is "approved" can visit someone. It is harder if you did not known the person before they were incarcerated. You generally cannot have any felony convictions. But no, they are not strictly for family members.
