MittenScarpetta
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2018
- Messages
- 1,830
- Reaction score
- 8,343
The 8-9 minutes is simple math, and knowing conclusively know s/he dawdled for 8-9 minutes is simple logic.
1 3:50 ....Per LE, the perp was first seen on video at 3:50. That would be when he first entered the hall, since that's where the cams were, and it would be a kitchen-to-hall door, since the exterior kitchen door is where he broke into the building. So we can place the perp's location at 3:50 with some certainty.
2 3:59/9 ...Perp is seen on timestamped video available to us at the SW corner area of the church.
3 Math ...that means there was 8-9 minutes between when the perp was first seen by LE entering the halls from the kitchen, and when he was seen in the SW corner
4 Fact ...it's not that far from pt A to pt B to take anywhere near 8-9 minutes in an empty building ... it's a stroll of perhaps a minute
5 Logic ... in getting from pt A to when we see him at pt B, he couldn't have done so in a beeline or even a purposeful walk, so instead must have dawdled, backtracked, detoured, or somesuch
Respectfully, I understand all of that. I think my point was more towards the fact that he actually could have went straight to the sw corner just to scope it out, went somewhere else and then was back in the sw corner at 358. As we all know, theres about 28 more minutes of video we have not seen.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk