ardenmost
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2016
- Messages
- 385
- Reaction score
- 3
WHO is the friend?
I asked earlier, but just got aside comment that friend would have wanted privacy.........
WHO is the friend?
Going rate for a good one (i.e. slipping thru the Mexicanborder and back) is about $10K. Isuspect you could find someone for less. Im sure it would have to be cash. TX I suspect has a higher cash culture than parts of the country wherenon-docd workers are a smaller percentage of the economy. Many of the SW gang could probably come up withthat kind of cash if you gave them a little time. But it could just as well havebeen a non-cash deal. IF it was a hit(not saying it was, but that it is viable).The more I have read and studied, the more I think this person knew what they were doing. I don't think that would include a house wife (IMO). I do think she was targeted, by an expert, probably for someone else. What bothered me was, how would they pay for it and not get caught? I did some reading and read about "Bitcoin" that is not traceable. Anyway, I do think a hit was definitely possible.
BB' statement that MB was a godly women has always bothered me(?), considering, that he must have known the affair(s) would be revealed. MB was murdered in a church... was this meant for some kind of symbolic meaning?
I asked earlier, but just got aside comment that friend would have wanted privacy.........
Did they give a reason or reasons for why they thought he was involved?
Going rate for a good one (i.e. slipping thru the Mexicanborder and back) is about $10K. Isuspect you could find someone for less. I’m sure it would have to be cash. TX I suspect has a higher cash culture than parts of the country wherenon-doc’d workers are a smaller percentage of the economy. Many of the SW gang could probably come up withthat kind of cash if you gave them a little time. But it could just as well havebeen a non-cash “deal”. IF it was a hit(not saying it was, but that it is viable).
Apparently someone else who was also going on the fishing trip. But not named publicly, and name obviously not important for our purposes anyhow.
I asked earlier, but just got aside comment that friend would have wanted privacy.........
First, Thanks to Scout for pointing out that the "tunnel" I had on each side was indicative that I had something wrong. Spent some time thinking that no, I had to be right but I was so not. But it bothered me that something did have to be wrong. So I went through pictures seeing things just as I had seen then before until I got to the one photo toward the kitchen that would be absolutely impossible if done in a building constructed from my map. So, back to the drawing board and things seem much better (at least to me).
Second, I have removed the label for Room 10 that I had placed there. When working on constructing the map there were photos (probably to many kids to take out to make it meaningful to post) that I had believed to be in room 10. However, the only true photos of room 10 only make it possible to narrow it down to a room on the east side or possibly the south side of the stage.
Third, I had previously colored Room 2 as a room that had been seen on the inside (via photos). Turns out not so. It was the next room up to the North. So both of those rooms have shifted color.
I have given a label to each room that isn't known - so that at least there is a way to reference them.
And finally, I have added the date to the bottom of the map, by the legend, so that there is a way to know how current that is.
I was not able to see any of the actual posts. Would someone be able to tell me if he is in any of the pictures he posted, or anyone he was with is in any of the posted pictures? Thank you and I am sorry if this has already been addressed.
This may be the "mystery" object right here in SP's right side pants pocket. I am wondering if perhaps BATBRAT can measure the object in SP's hand to see if it matches the protuberance in the capture?
If this object matches (cling-wrap?) and if it turns out, that MB was in any way "cling-wrapped" (?), then this clearly was a viciously planned and cold blooded murder.
All IMO.
-Nin
It is absolutely a possibility that BB "could have been a party. No one has been ruled out yet. MPD has only said his "alibi" checks out. Since no one has been arrested and charged, we have to assume it "could" be anyone.
MOO
BB calling MB a “godly woman” would be expected for a woman who believed in God and sat in church almost every Sunday. It would be more unusual to not hear that (sat in a funeral in the area yesterday and heard that phrase probably 7-8 times.)
That phrase is not necessarily a testimony to her goodness and character but to the goodness and character of the God she believed in, who she entrusted would provide forgiveness for any wrong she had done in her life. It reflected her beliefs. Not so much a “compliment” but an assurance(and esp in light of her death).
To boot, I do not think BB anticipated a large, national stage immediately being constructed where every word he uttered would be parsed around the globe.
To keep the record straight, this (the idea that BB drove home alone and arrived home alone) is contrary to known fact. No one has said BB drove home alone, and in fact quite the opposite - it has been often stated that he wasn't driving on the return trip (perhaps all of it, perhaps some of it). Furthermore, no one (in the know) has said he arrived back at his home alone either. An erroneous assumption by someone would still be erroneous, and these don't really align with anything we have been told.
Nin, what video is that first pic on the left from? I don't think I've seen it before. TIA.
Agreed. And as much as I hate to sound like a broken record, BB himself said the police shouldn't rule him out or anyone else close to MB. I don't really understand the difference of opinion about leaving him out of the conversation when he is agreeing to be part of the conversation (in general, re: LE, the media, etc.) I say this mostly unconvinced that he is involved.
Looking good, Jethro. Glad to see you're still working on it.
Did they give a reason or reasons for why they thought he was involved?
I think there are some number of us here - of whom I am included - whose thinking is that just because we can make up random scenarios that would include BB, that doesn't mean that his involvement is somehow "likely," especially given the fact that we've seen no evidence to actually indicate any involvement by him. Personally, if he had been involved, given the scrutiny, I would expect we'd have already seen some evidence somewhere that at least hints of that by now. But nothing, not even a tiny whiff of evidence to indicate his possible involvement.